Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv

Re:

"Of all the people I know, including both amateur and professional entomologists who have experience of this moth, I know of none who doubts that differential bird predation is of primary importance in the spread and decline of melanism in the peppered moth."


And this is similar to the logic that says:

"As a believer in fundamentalism, I know of no one who seriously doubts the existence of God amongst the theologians and churchgoers I have personally met."

Logic that goes round and round.


19 posted on 01/04/2005 8:18:10 AM PST by ColoCdn (Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: ColoCdn

*sigh*

The point he is making is that no one who observes the moths can have any doubt about the significance of bird predation. This is a key point that Wells is challenging in his attempts to trivialize bird predation. It's actually one of the oldest inane objections to the peppered moth natural selection model (Wells even notes it early in the above article).

Is it just my imagination, or is it always evolution opponents who exhibit such deplorable reading comprehension skills in these threads?


24 posted on 01/04/2005 8:23:37 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson