Its too much trouble to count the votes, because the''votes'' aren't real votes at all.I seem to remember some years ago another tight election between Lorretta Sanchez and one of my favorite guys Bob Dornan She won by a few number of ''votes''. Later on when people were trying to track some of the ballots because they're were also discrepencies, mystery ballots, etc. Nobody could find out why things weren't adding up. It turned out a lot of these ballots were peoples, pets, dogs, goldfish whatever.All from DemocRAT counties. No, I cant prove any of this, but I heard Bob Dornan speak of this some years ago, with all the craziness going on in Washington now I tend to believe it's all true!
That election is pretty widely considered to have been stolen.
YOU don't have to. Loretta Sanchez, AKA the Polish Latina, invented people, invented houses, and registered the dead (and many of those were illegals). Furthermore, many of those invented, were multiple voters.
In a refreshing change from these creative tactics, she bowed to a long-standing Democrat tradition to issue inactive registered voters absentee ballots, and used them as needed, multiple times of course.
IMHO, not knowing a goldarn thing about King County, WA, this is probably how they came up with the winning votes there. It's the easiest. The registered, inactive (some because they are dead)voter is God's Gift to the Democrats.
The real question is now that Loretta is divorcing Sanchez, is she still Mexican? Her vote base is still dead, so it's a trick question.
As I recall, a MI Republican congressman named "Ehlers" (may not be exact name) sabotaged Robert Dornan's claim of fruad in the CA election.
And Dornan never did get a fair hearing on the matter, nor was anything done to bounce that snake Sanchez out of the seat she stole from him. Sanchez didn't even live in Dornan's district. She rented a place there but never occupied it. Dornan's people had proof that the utilities were never even turned on.
It appears that third world countries aren't the only ones that need independent oversight of the elections process.