Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
An infinitely increasing population is a recipe for disaster. There are very real limits to water tables, arable land, and so forth. Exponential systems always crash.

Population isn't really exponential excepted in limited conditions, such as the remarkable medical advances of the past 100 years. When the average lifespan was 45 and the possible lifespan was, say 100, then an exponential jump was possible. With the possible lifespan pretty well reached, population isn't growing quite so fast.

Nor is there any real shortage of arable land. I live next to one of the largest cities in the world and arable land is being gobbled up for development simply because it is nearly worthless as arable land. By the population gloom and doomers' own numbers, we could support at least ten times the planetary population we have.

405 posted on 01/03/2005 11:45:50 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies ]


To: hopespringseternal
By the population gloom and doomers' own numbers, we could support at least ten times the planetary population we have.

There are various organizations, as well as studies done by our own government which say fishing stocks have markedly declined because of population growth. More people means more pollution - live in any large city to witness this. And I don't want to live on a planet that is wall to wall people.

409 posted on 01/03/2005 11:50:33 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson