Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bella_Bru
It's not immature though to not want children. Not everyone has the desire to raise kids. Why is that so tough for you to understand?

In most cases, it is. Wanting only two children qualifies as well. No society can be maintained with that sort of outlook.

326 posted on 01/03/2005 10:38:03 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]


To: hopespringseternal
No society can be maintained with that sort of outlook.

Wow. How...socialist of you. We must all have many kids to keep the social services machine running? So, I guess you don't give a damn who has to pay for them (welfare is swellfare as long as you have kids!) or give a damn if they are wanted, just so long as people have them. Great attitude. F* what happens to them once they are here, just make sure they get here!

339 posted on 01/03/2005 10:46:07 AM PST by Bella_Bru (You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal

Quote: No society can be maintained with that sort of outlook.

Aren't you the salfish one.. wanting to make sure somone takes care of you in old age.


345 posted on 01/03/2005 10:49:37 AM PST by superiorslots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal
In most cases, it is. Wanting only two children qualifies as well. No society can be maintained with that sort of outlook.

The only reason we need to keep growing the population in the US is because we have set up the social security pyramid scheme. Without an ever-increasing taxpayer base, SS falls apart.

Other than paying for the welfare state, there is absolutely no reason that we need anything more than replacement rate fertility in this country.

349 posted on 01/03/2005 10:51:06 AM PST by Modernman (What is moral is what you feel good after. - Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

To: hopespringseternal
Wanting only two children qualifies as well. No society can be maintained with that sort of outlook.

An infinitely increasing population is a recipe for disaster. There are very real limits to water tables, arable land, and so forth. Exponential systems always crash.

368 posted on 01/03/2005 10:58:27 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson