Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stuartcr
...'It appears that while there are always exceptions...'
I believe this is the key. My definition of an absolute is something that has no exceptions.

I meant there are exceptions (like the Yanamoto) to the pool of people believing certain moral propositions. That Spartans taught their sons to steal does not in itself show that there is no moral law about stealing. It only shows there are differences of opinion about what that moral law is.

The being (or absoluteness?) of a law does not depend on its being known, does it? Wasn't Australia the largest island (or smallest continent) before it was discovered?

396 posted on 01/06/2005 8:23:21 AM PST by Mad Dawg (My P226 wants to teach you what SIGnify means ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg

While the Spartan example does show that there are differing opinions of what moral law is, there is nothing in itself that does show a moral law either.

I think a law is quite different than a land mass.


399 posted on 01/06/2005 8:38:49 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson