To: ArGee
I am not quite sure I understand your argument.
If you mean that a man would "abort" his responsibility and then it was the woman's problem, that would be interesting to piss of the liberals, but doesn't do any good if your a father and the mother wants to abort the child. As of now, it's too bad for you if the man wants the child and the woman doesn't.
To: Andrewksu
If you mean that a man would "abort" his responsibility and then it was the woman's problem, that would be interesting to piss of the liberals, but doesn't do any good if your a father and the mother wants to abort the child. As of now, it's too bad for you if the man wants the child and the woman doesn't. It's the first. It really pi$$es off the woman you're arguing with. She won't agree to sign. In fact, she'll likely fly off the handle. When she does, get a knowing look in your eyes and say, "Oh, I see. It's not about choice. It's about exercising power. Some civil rights issue."
Shalom.
211 posted on
01/12/2005 1:49:51 PM PST by
ArGee
(After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson