Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArGee
I am not quite sure I understand your argument.

If you mean that a man would "abort" his responsibility and then it was the woman's problem, that would be interesting to piss of the liberals, but doesn't do any good if your a father and the mother wants to abort the child. As of now, it's too bad for you if the man wants the child and the woman doesn't.
207 posted on 01/12/2005 1:45:55 PM PST by Andrewksu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: Andrewksu
If you mean that a man would "abort" his responsibility and then it was the woman's problem, that would be interesting to piss of the liberals, but doesn't do any good if your a father and the mother wants to abort the child. As of now, it's too bad for you if the man wants the child and the woman doesn't.

It's the first. It really pi$$es off the woman you're arguing with. She won't agree to sign. In fact, she'll likely fly off the handle. When she does, get a knowing look in your eyes and say, "Oh, I see. It's not about choice. It's about exercising power. Some civil rights issue."

Shalom.

211 posted on 01/12/2005 1:49:51 PM PST by ArGee (After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson