Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
The way I read things, your big newsworthy finding isn't a big newsworthy finding if you flat-out *don't deal* with straightforward, obvious objections. (And, just in general, the way you and the guy at Creation-Safaris read things has a one-way ratchet and pawl in it somewhere.)

Once again you miss the point. We are talking speciation vs. variation. What does the data say, not what do we want the data to say.

Speciation has not been demonstrated to be a truth. Simple, really. In fact, we see attempts to pawn variation off as speciation. Typical of the Liberal scientist with an agenda.

48 posted on 01/03/2005 9:14:23 AM PST by bondserv (Sincerity with God is the most powerful instigator for change! † [Check out my profile page])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: bondserv

Haven't figured it out yet?


49 posted on 01/03/2005 9:21:00 AM PST by js1138 (D*mn, I Missed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: bondserv
Once again you miss the point. We are talking speciation vs. variation.

Speciation in evolution doesn't go "Poof!" Things change little by little.

Speciation has not been demonstrated to be a truth.

Do you have a source for this? Duane Gish waving his arms? Your own amnesia?

61 posted on 01/03/2005 12:30:04 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson