I'm all for NeoCons, if fighting muslims is what they want us to do.
Cuz 9/11/2001 shoulda taught us muslims want to fight.
From what I've seen, Rumsfeld and the neocons agree on the need to fight muslims.
The details come down to which ones, where and when. We've been plodding along on that.
The entire political left, and the anti-war right can bring no light, for they mistakenly believe muslims don't need fighting.
Or that they have a superior insight into the question of which ones, where, and when.
That is it for me, in a nutshell. Between Rumsfeld or Buchanan, I'll take Rumsfeld.
Kristol and Buchanan have a lot in common. They've earned livings their entire adult lives, by stirring up controversy to write and talk about.
Rumsfeld has NEVER been in that category, which elevates him immensely.
I thought the "Muslims" you want to fight were our "allies" in Iraq (over 90 percent Muslim).