[Guyin4Os]

If humans and dinosaurs had co-existed, humans would have been eaten to extinction.

Yes, assuming they lived in the same places on the globe. But not a very scientific assumption.

[Dimensio]

Yes, assuming they lived in the same places on the globe. But not a very scientific assumption.

Except that the "evidence" that you cited (for which you presented no references) would require exactly that.

[Doctor Stochastic]

Yes, assuming they lived in the same places on the globe.

Then they wouldn't have tracks in the same place either, of course.

[Modernman]

Yes, assuming they lived in the same places on the globe. But not a very scientific assumption.

Your post 25 mentions human and dino footprints that supposedly were laid down in the same place at the same time (or at least, during the same geological era).

So, your evidence, if true, shows that humans and dinosaurs existed in the same place at the same time.

What do you think the average lifespan would be for humans living in a world populated by numerous multi-ton predators?

[stremba]

So then, if dinos and humans lived in separate parts of the world, the dino and human footprints that supposedly proved that dinos and humans coexisted happened how?