[shubi]

AIG says their's is "bible-based", too.

Taking illogical positions that contradict what any reasonable person sees is plainly true is somewhat cultish, wouldn't you say?

There is no need for you to argue against science if you interpret Scripture rationally.

The reason the Roman Catholics have the magisterium is to avoid several different bible-based interpretations of the same verse. I don't agree with your take on some of the Bible. I have given evidence of how I think Genesis should be interpreted. You disagree. But my interpretation is just as "bible-based" as yours-probably more.

[D Edmund Joaquin]

Is the Ark real, shubi

[safisoft]

I have given evidence of how I think Genesis should be interpreted. You disagree. But my interpretation is just as "bible-based" as yours-probably more.

No, previously on this thread you stated that your interpretation was the only correct one. You made yourself the standard and gave no leeway for dissent. Hmm, sounds rather papal to me. Maybe we are on to something. Who are you REALLY?