You are mistaken when you attribute your interpretation of stars falling to common sense. Common sense doesn't allow us to know that it wasn't 1/3 of the stars at all. Awareness that (a) stars are like our sun (b) very far away and (c) exist in large numbers are not derived from common sense. They are all comparatively modern fruits of science that have altered biblical interpretation.
To a medieval priest the belief that 1/3 of the stars in the sky could fall, perhaps creating small craters like meteorites, would have seemed perfectly reasonable. That priest would mock the "new" science of astronomy with its talk of countless stars like our sun and point out that his beliefs have scriptural authority (references to stars falling, references to the stars in heaven stopping in their tracks, geocentric view of universe). I contend that my hypothetical medieval priest mocking the notion of other suns is in exactly the same position as a modern pastor who rejects the evidence for an ancient universe and evolution.
"You are mistaken when you attribute your interpretation of stars falling to common sense. Common sense doesn't allow us to know that it wasn't 1/3 of the stars at all."
Fine believe whatever you choose, really gives me neither a negative or a positive, what others choose to believe.