Whether one believes Bible stories is mostly irrelevant to science, except where there is sufficient evidence. there is sufficient evidence to determine the age of the earth, the age of the geologic strata, the age of fossils, the relationship of species as seen in their DNA.
It may be irrelevant to science but it has staggering implications for eternity.
I'm not a proponent of a 6 days 6 thousand years ago creation, I don't believe that the original text supports it. I'm a disciple of Jesus and friend of God through the blood sacrifice of Jesus - in a cognitive, dynamic, growing relationship with God.
As I have stated elsewhere on this forum, whatever God did, He did it ex niliho ... speaking something into existence from nothing. How he did it is beyond figuring out. How it continues at this time, based on observations of current phenomena as well as study of what has been deposited and recorded over time, is what science is about.
You are, however, assuming that these observations reveal behaviors that continue now as they always have. While this may in fact be what is happening, an unprovable assumption is the undergirding for how "scientific facts" are established.
This methodology works well for positing how things will behave in the future ... but again, only if you assume that things will continue as they always have.
My faith (assumption) informs me that they won't, God has other plans.
They will say, “Where is this ‘coming’ he promised? Ever since our fathers died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation. But they deliberately forget that long ago by God's word the heavens existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water. By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed. By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment” 2Peter 3:4-7
I really don't think anything I say is opposed to God. I do oppose ignorance, and I oppose people who say the same discredited things over and over and over.
I say science must make the assumption that physical laws and processes are uniform over time. That does not mean there are no miracles, but it does mean that science isn't science without the assumption that any given phenomenon is "natural".
Personally I don't believe God does a lot of Cecil B. deMille miracles. I don't rest my faith on this kind of wand waving. My personal faith is based on the words that touch my heart and inspire me to be kind and loving to others. This does not require proof and is not susceptable to falsification. I'm just not interested in theology.