Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Central Scrutiniser
Well personally I do not believe that the whole earth was flooded. Why, because of the length of time it would take for the waters to recede and an olive leaf to be found.

I keep foremost in my mind the reason for the flood, that tells me that it was people specific and Noah was pure. What follows is a cleansing of the flesh that had been polluted.

Can I prove that the flood did not encompass the whole earth, rather just the earth afflicted with the pollution, no. You can't disproved it either, other than to mock and jeer, but hey there is nothing new under the sun now is there?
49 posted on 01/02/2005 1:38:54 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts
Can I prove that the flood did not encompass the whole earth, rather just the earth afflicted with the pollution, no. You can't disproved it either ...

What Would We Expect to Find if the World had Flooded?
Problems with a Global Flood.
The Geologic Column and its Implications for the Flood. By a former creationist.

50 posted on 01/02/2005 1:43:08 PM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Just mythoughts
Can I prove that the flood did not encompass the whole earth, rather just the earth afflicted with the pollution, no. You can't disproved it either,

You are the one proposing that the flood happened. The burden is on you to prove it.

77 posted on 01/02/2005 3:35:54 PM PST by Modernman (What is moral is what you feel good after. - Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson