To: Lucky Dog
You may have missed a number of posts on this thread where theory-of-evolution advocates have vociferously insisted that the theory is "fact. The theory explains how, the natural history of our world is the fact.
There are respected authorities who posed intelligent design as an alternative scientific theory to evolution.
Correction: There are respected authorities who posed intelligent design as an alternative scientific theory to evolution. See The Raelians
The current theory of evolution leaves some serious scientific questions unanswered (see post #468).
All answered now. Will that change your argument? Are you capable of learning?
483 posted on
01/04/2005 11:08:24 AM PST by
balrog666
(I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.)
To: balrog666
The theory explains how, the natural history of our world is the fact.
Forgive me if I question the logic of your comment. However, no theory can explain how a fact is a fact. it either is or it isn't. Theory can only speculate how (a potential causal mechanism) a fact came to exist.
All answered now. Will that change your argument?
Unfortunately, I still have not found your arguments (including the links) to be entirely conclusive. Therefore, the problems are not "all answered" in a convincing manner. Therefore, it appears we should agree to disagree.
Are you capable of learning?
It is absolutely amazing that so many advocates of a theory that apparently can never be experimentally verified [at least according the advocates posting on this thread] find it necessary to try to personally insult those who disagree with them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson