LD--"The history of France had eye witnesses who wrote about it contemporaneously. Macro-evolution has no such witnesses. There is only evidence which is subject to differing interpretations. "
He actually seems to think this was a substantive rebuttal!
He says he is a scientist but doesn't understand the simple concept of macroevolution!
Micro and Macro are the same process. We instruct them on this repeatedly and get repeatedly ignored. Sometimes this debate becomes more a wall talking to exercise.
Proponents of evolution often attempt to discredit creation by pointing to occurrences of microevolution, such as speciation, adaptation, etc. To the evolutionist, microevolution is vindication for their belief in the much larger macroevolution. Their belief is that if these microevolutionary changes have enough time to accumulate, then eventually this will lead to a macroevolutionary change. And therefore, in their way of thinking, if microevolution is a well established fact, macroevolution must logically be an established fact as well.
Please see post 433. Sorry, I neglected to put you as an addressee.