Given that you falsely claimed that Antony Flew had rejected evolution, why should anything that you say be trusted given that you have used falsehoods to support your position in the past?
"Given that you falsely claimed that Antony Flew had rejected evolution, why should anything that you say be trusted given that you have used falsehoods to support your position in the past?"
I've never heard of this "Antony Flew" nor have I ever posted anything about this individual - especially since I have NEVER heard of this person before in my life ... so your ridiculous accusation remains just that ->
RIDICULOUS!
The same goes for the hypothesis of "evolution" ->
Ridiculous!