Hooters Contributes to Republicans!

Let's see now

Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday

101 posted on 01/02/2005 1:04:39 PM PST by reg45

Let's see now.

Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday

102 posted on 01/02/2005 1:11:00 PM PST by reg45

Absolutely! Well said!

103 posted on 01/02/2005 1:35:59 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell (Support our troops!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Must be the itty bitty kind in there. Doesn't seem to be much room for anything else.

104 posted on 01/02/2005 2:22:06 PM PST by kylaka

Boy, that one on the right looks pretty jealous! lol

105 posted on 01/02/2005 2:23:40 PM PST by TheForceOfOne

To: presidio9; Constitution Day; Tijeras_Slim; martin_fierro; TomServo; Owl_Eagle; Dead Dog; sathers; ..

P.J. sez...Oh HELL yeah! (and Happy New Year!)

PING to the REPUBLICAN PARTY REPTILE ping list! What is the Republican Party Reptile? It is a creature of the eighties. It's neoconservatism with its pants down around its ankles, the Rehnquist Supreme Court on drugs, a disco Hobbes living without shame or federally mandated safety regulations. The Republican Party Reptile supports a strong defense policy, but sees no reason to conduct it while sober. The RPR believes in minimum government interference in private affairs; unless the government brings over extra girls and some ice. In short, the RPR is the new label that our political spectrum has been crying out for; the conservative with a sense of humor and a healthy dose of depravity.

106 posted on 01/02/2005 5:02:05 PM PST by TheBigB ("Eat my rubber!"--Clark W. Griswold, Jr.)

He was on the radio replay of Laura Ingraham I think. He's got little kids too.

107 posted on 01/02/2005 5:03:20 PM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Wait, what does James Dobson think about this?

108 posted on 01/02/2005 5:06:49 PM PST by risk

109 posted on 01/02/2005 5:14:08 PM PST by Ramtek57

I'm against Hooters

And you can still type???
When I'm against some hooters, usually I don't be typing anything.

110 posted on 01/02/2005 5:18:19 PM PST by humblegunner (And who knows what else?)

The Buffalo Chicken Wings are world-famous. If you don't have a local Hooters near you, pick a box up in the frozen chicken section of your local grocer.

111 posted on 01/02/2005 5:30:15 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)

112 posted on 01/02/2005 5:38:03 PM PST by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")

Well I can't compliment my brains :D

113 posted on 01/02/2005 5:40:18 PM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)

114 posted on 01/02/2005 5:44:15 PM PST by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")

115 posted on 01/02/2005 5:47:05 PM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)

To: Common Tator

Who would da thunk NBC, MSNBC and CNBC supports Republican more than Fox News!!!

Go To: Choose The Blue > Entertainment and News > Television Networks

Click on a column heading to sort

Products in the Television Networks Category:

Brand	Parent Company	% to Dem	% to Rep	$ to Dem	$ to Rep	Other Brands of Parent
ABC	Walt Disney Co	70%	30%	$606,504	$259,930	Walt Disney Co, others...
Black Entertainment Television (BET)	Salamander Farm	100%	0%	$65,500	$0	Charlotte Bobcats
Bravo Channel	General Electric	33%	67%	$244,748	$496,912	General Electric, others...
CBS	Viacom Inc	78%	22%	$892,513	$251,734	MTV, others...
CMT	Viacom Inc	78%	22%	$892,513	$251,734	MTV, others...
CNBC	General Electric	33%	67%	$244,748	$496,912	General Electric, others...
Comedy Channel	Viacom Inc	78%	22%	$892,513	$251,734	MTV, others...
Discovery Communications	Discovery Communications	86%	14%	$78,689	$12,809	None Known
Encore	Starz Encore Group	4%	96%	$1,617	$38,822	Starz, others...
ESPN	Walt Disney Co	70%	30%	$606,504	$259,930	Walt Disney Co, others...
Fox	News Corp	61%	39%	$689,549	$434,224	Fox Cable Networks, others...
Fox News	News Corp	61%	39%	$689,549	$434,224	Fox Cable Networks, others...
Fox Sports	News Corp	61%	39%	$689,549	$434,224	Fox Cable Networks, others...
Fox Television	News Corp	61%	39%	$689,549	$434,224	Fox Cable Networks, others...
Galavision	Univision Music Group	0%	100%	$0	$28,000	Univision Network, others...
MSNBC	General Electric	33%	67%	$244,748	$496,912	General Electric, others...
MTV	Viacom Inc	78%	22%	$892,513	$251,734	Viacom Inc, others...
NBC	General Electric	33%	67%	$244,748	$496,912	General Electric, others...
Showtime	Viacom Inc	78%	22%	$892,513	$251,734	MTV, others...
Starz	Starz Encore Group	4%	96%	$1,617	$38,822	STARZ! Kids, others...
STARZ! Family	Starz Encore Group	4%	96%	$1,617	$38,822	Starz, others...
STARZ! Kids	Starz Encore Group	4%	96%	$1,617	$38,822	Starz, others...
TeleFutura Network	Univision Music Group	0%	100%	$0	$28,000	Univision Network, others...
The Movie Channel	Viacom Inc	78%	22%	$892,513	$251,734	MTV, others...
The Sundance Channel	Viacom Inc	78%	22%	$892,513	$251,734	MTV, others...
Univision Network	Univision Music Group	0%	100%	$0	$28,000	TeleFutura Network, others...
UPN	Viacom Inc	78%	22%	$892,513	$251,734	MTV, others...
WAM!	Starz Encore Group	4%	96%	$1,617	$38,822	Starz, others...
YES Network	YES Network	100%	0%	$218,825	$0	None Known

Brands belonging to companies without PACs and where the total federal political contributions from employees is less than $15,000 are listed in black text. Percentages are not calculated for these companies.

All numbers used on this site pertain to the 2003-2004 election cycle and were gathered from information in the public domain, including data from the Federal Election Commission's website (www.fec.gov) and from the Center for Responsive Politics (www.opensecrets.org) as available on December 12, 2004, unless otherwise noted. ChooseTheBlue.com has not independently validated the data, takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions, and assumes no responsibility to update the data. There is no relationship between ChooseTheBlue.com and the Center for Responsive Politics or the Federal Election Commission, and use of such data does not imply their endorsement. Note that hard money federal political contributions by corporations and labor unions generally are prohibited by law For more information about the data presented, please see the "FAQ" section of this website. Please direct any comments or questions to webmaster@choosetheblue.com

116 posted on 01/02/2005 5:47:43 PM PST by Toidylop

It has been said, when a man is too 'mature and holy' for looking at pretty girls, and responding like the male of the species is designed, he's not much good for anything that requires arousal.

Just because a man is still functioning as God intended, physiologically, doesn't mean he isn't a conservative or that he IS a hypcrite. The idea of 'get saved' = 'get ugly, fat, bald, obese and unarousable' seems to pass for religious convictions and christian marriage these days.

It's an abomination.

117 posted on 01/02/2005 7:19:52 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 ("allahu akhbar..." the call to murder?)

To: Robert_Paulson2

There's a lot of confusion about sexuality in the context of being a faithful christian. I think it's because too many men and women struggle in that area. Outside influence doesn't help either. If I was married, I wouldn't like my husband going to Hooter's but it's better than going to a strip club.

118 posted on 01/02/2005 7:22:18 PM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Obligatory Hooters Pic!

119 posted on 01/02/2005 7:44:07 PM PST by Dashing Dasher (Because I fly, I envy no (wo)man on earth. - Anon)

Nice sentiment.... I like you.

120 posted on 01/02/2005 7:45:34 PM PST by Dashing Dasher (Because I fly, I envy no (wo)man on earth. - Anon)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794