Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: qam1
I don't understand why the AARP opposes SS reform. They are already collecting, so why should they care what the younger people do with their money?

Even their official statement makes no sense: "Taking some of the money that workers pay into the system and diverting it into newly created private accounts would weaken Social Security and put benefits for future generations at risk,"

Future generations won't need SS benefits if we are allowed to save/invest instead of having forced contributions to a dead-end program. Please...some AARP Freeper out there explain to me how am I supposed to secure MY retirement, when I am forced to contribute to YOURS? Obviously didn't bother to invest or save when you were in your earning years if you are now living on SS benefits.

15 posted on 01/02/2005 10:05:39 AM PST by Ludicrous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ludicrous

AARP has many more members under the age of 60 than over the age of 60. Membership age starts at 50 and AARP is being run by the younger members.


31 posted on 01/02/2005 11:31:01 AM PST by lolhelp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson