Rubbish. If they don't allege ties to Al Queda, it goes on a motion to dismiss. If they do allege these ties, they don't have evidence to back it up and lose on summary judgment. Go back to law school.
A khalerye. The personal attack was unwarranted. Unless you plan on starting a flame fest, quit violating FR rules.
Unlike the ALCU, Al-Qaeda doesn't hand out membership cards to its affiliates. We do know that Hamas is tied to Al-Qaeda and CAIR has been a primary promoter of the objectives of Hamas within the U.S., both politically and financially. If this is a civil RICO attack, we're looking at the actions of all of the spokes on the conspiracy wheel, i.e. the plaintiffs' burden is easier. The judge might bounce the action but it isn't the slam dunk you portray on CAIR's behalf. To the contrary, what is alleged has a good chance of making it to a jury.