Posted on 01/01/2005 7:08:48 PM PST by Dubya
I guess I should stick it out in NY - its got problems, but sometimes the devil you know is better then the devil you don't.
Northeast Texas to Mexico (I-69/TTC)
Interstate 69 is a planned 1,600-mile national highway connecting Mexico, the United States and Canada . Eight states are involved in the project: Michigan, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas.
Three national studies conducted between 1995 and 2000 have confirmed the feasibility of this project and laid the groundwork for planning efforts at the state and regional level.
Once completed, I-69 will extend from Port Huron, Michigan to the Texas/Mexico border.
Each state will oversee development of its specific section of I-69 while ensuring coordination at the national level. In Texas , I-69 will be developed as part of the Trans-Texas Corridor, a proposed multi-use, statewide network of transportation routes that will incorporate existing and new highways, railways and utility right-of-ways. This section is currently referred to as the Northeast Texas to Mexico element, or I-69/TTC.
The majority of I-69 has not been constructed, and most states including Texas are currently undergoing detailed environmental and engineering studies to identify the preferred location of the future interstate.Though part of a larger, national project, I-69/TTC will be developed in Texas under the TTC master plan. A second corridor the Oklahoma to Mexico/Gulf Coast element, or TTC-35 is also under development. As other routes are identified, additional project pages will be added to this Web site.
http://www.nationali69.org/
The Interstate 69 Steering Committee is composed of representatives from the eight state departments of transportation in the Interstate 69 corridor -- Michigan, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas -- and from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD) serves as Committees lead agency and provides administrative support.
I agree with you on that - any industrial production that can take place in Mexico, and employ a Mexican worker there, is one less who would consider illegally crossing the border - and that's more of a benefit to the US then employing someone in china at the same job.
In other news, solar reflection from the road surface causes additional ozone hole.....women, children and minorities hit hardest.
LA and Orange county have no room for massive expansion. It's surrounded by mountains, with deserts beyond that. The only place for them to build is inland, or the deserts. Look for massive influx of immigrants to places like Texas, and most everywhere else that happens to have room for many millions of people.
And if the project tanks, imagine the nifty airports we'd have!
And a new place to land the Shuttle, and imagine, instead of a quarter mile, a string of 25 mile drag strips!
NASCAR could go linear! Nnnnaoooowwww there goes the pack!
Sailplanes could use the huge black strip as a source of thermals!
SLAC and Los Alamos could use the center strip for a world-class LINAC!
The awesome benefits just boggle the mind.
The failure of modern transportation engineering is the idea that making 1 super-pathway is better than multiple smaller feeders.
Make several smaller 3 lane highways crisscrossing popular areas rather than trying to shift everyone onto the same vein. A 6-lane highway sucks if all you're doing is going 15 miles out of town and have to wait 10 minutes just to get on because the engineer didn't want too many on-ramps slowing his road down.
You drive on LBJ, I'll drive on George Bush. You drive on 610, I'll drive on Sam Houston. You drive on I-35 or Central through the High 5, I'll drive on the Tollway. You drive on Beltline, I'll take the Tunnel.
Have you actually ever driven in Dallas or Houston or down I-35 from the Red River to San Antonio?
NASCAR could go linear! Nnnnaoooowwww there goes the pack!
Southern States obviously have their mind made up on business growth continuance.
What has been confirmed by red voting State maps primarily in the South is business expansion above and beyond blue voting States.
Nothing wrong with planning to keep feeding what's already in growth motion to keep unemployment dropping further.
As I said many years ago, the only benefit Texas will see out of Nafta is one hell of a freeway, at OUR expense.
As I said many years ago, the only benefit Texas will see out of Nafta is one hell of a freeway, at OUR expense.
The Local and State government are always behind in road planning. They let areas get developed without creating a plan of action to have the infrastructure grow with the defined area. You end up with an area that is fully developed with 20 year old infrastructure. Throw in constant utility upgrades were parts of the streets get ripped up ever few months by (insert utility company name here). You get a big headache from constant construction.
Yeah! What do these private investors think they're doing? Everyone knows that only the government can do things right.
Spain huh.This is going no where. He better start talking to American Companies and fast. Texans love the Land. They'll keep this tied up in court till Perry is in anursing home.
From the location shown on the map. this is not going to happen in my lifetime. he is essentially trying to destroy Texas. Bush didn't like him now I know why. I see he wants to make it easier for the illegals to get to Houston. actually it's the port, but this is untenable.
This is not about SS or Gov. it's about the land.
It isn't just highway. It has double tracked railroad, utilities, space for future high speed trains, four lanes of truck traffic, and six lanes of cars plus other rights of ways. I'd rather have a well thought out set of corridors than a hodgepodge of ill-connected expanded freeways. When was the last time you travelled down I-35 between San Antonio and DFW? Why should people from the valley or the Gulf Coast have to travel all the way to Austin in order to get to Dallas?
I wouldn't bet the farm on Mexico trade.Asia, China and India is acing them out of the picture. Better build more ports.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.