Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposed I-69 truly mammoth (TEXAS)
The Associated Press ^ | an. 01, 2005 | Jim Vertuno

Posted on 01/01/2005 7:08:48 PM PST by Dubya

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Joe Hadenuf

I guess I should stick it out in NY - its got problems, but sometimes the devil you know is better then the devil you don't.


21 posted on 01/01/2005 7:39:36 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Northeast Texas to Mexico (I-69/TTC)

Interstate 69 is a planned 1,600-mile national highway connecting Mexico, the United States and Canada . Eight states are involved in the project: Michigan, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas.

Three national studies conducted between 1995 and 2000 have confirmed the feasibility of this project and laid the groundwork for planning efforts at the state and regional level.

Once completed, I-69 will extend from Port Huron, Michigan to the Texas/Mexico border.

Each state will oversee development of its specific section of I-69 while ensuring coordination at the national level. In Texas , I-69 will be developed as part of the Trans-Texas Corridor, a proposed multi-use, statewide network of transportation routes that will incorporate existing and new highways, railways and utility right-of-ways. This section is currently referred to as the Northeast Texas to Mexico element, or I-69/TTC.

The majority of I-69 has not been constructed, and most states – including Texas – are currently undergoing detailed environmental and engineering studies to identify the preferred location of the future interstate.Though part of a larger, national project, I-69/TTC will be developed in Texas under the TTC master plan. A second corridor – the Oklahoma to Mexico/Gulf Coast element, or TTC-35 – is also under development. As other routes are identified, additional project pages will be added to this Web site.


http://www.nationali69.org/
The Interstate 69 Steering Committee is composed of representatives from the eight state departments of transportation in the Interstate 69 corridor -- Michigan, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas -- and from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD) serves as Committee’s lead agency and provides administrative support.


22 posted on 01/01/2005 7:40:24 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65
"Anyone who travels I-35 knows something has to be done. Its like rush hour all day long, even in the remote countryside."

On Fridays and Sundays, yes and holidays specifically. That has more to do with College Students and vacationers, then anything else. Probably wouldn't hurt to put a highway in to cut across from College Station to either 35 at Waco or 45, instead of going to Austin and then coming up all the way up 35 to DFW.
23 posted on 01/01/2005 7:40:52 PM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

I agree with you on that - any industrial production that can take place in Mexico, and employ a Mexican worker there, is one less who would consider illegally crossing the border - and that's more of a benefit to the US then employing someone in china at the same job.


24 posted on 01/01/2005 7:41:21 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Buy stock in CEMEX .

In other news, solar reflection from the road surface causes additional ozone hole.....women, children and minorities hit hardest.

25 posted on 01/01/2005 7:42:43 PM PST by spokeshave (Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
That's one of the reasons we stay in Southern Cal.

LA and Orange county have no room for massive expansion. It's surrounded by mountains, with deserts beyond that. The only place for them to build is inland, or the deserts. Look for massive influx of immigrants to places like Texas, and most everywhere else that happens to have room for many millions of people.

26 posted on 01/01/2005 7:44:59 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (No more illegal alien sympathizers from Texas. America has one too many.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

And if the project tanks, imagine the nifty airports we'd have!

And a new place to land the Shuttle, and imagine, instead of a quarter mile, a string of 25 mile drag strips!

NASCAR could go linear! Nnnnaoooowwww there goes the pack!

Sailplanes could use the huge black strip as a source of thermals!

SLAC and Los Alamos could use the center strip for a world-class LINAC!

The awesome benefits just boggle the mind.


27 posted on 01/01/2005 7:45:21 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65

The failure of modern transportation engineering is the idea that making 1 super-pathway is better than multiple smaller feeders.

Make several smaller 3 lane highways crisscrossing popular areas rather than trying to shift everyone onto the same vein. A 6-lane highway sucks if all you're doing is going 15 miles out of town and have to wait 10 minutes just to get on because the engineer didn't want too many on-ramps slowing his road down.


28 posted on 01/01/2005 7:45:26 PM PST by Bogey78O (Hillary Clinton + Fertility pills + Scott Peterson + rowboat = Success)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nyboe
THE LAST THING WE NEED IN TEXAS IS FRICKIN TOLL ROADS !

You drive on LBJ, I'll drive on George Bush. You drive on 610, I'll drive on Sam Houston. You drive on I-35 or Central through the High 5, I'll drive on the Tollway. You drive on Beltline, I'll take the Tunnel.

Have you actually ever driven in Dallas or Houston or down I-35 from the Red River to San Antonio?

29 posted on 01/01/2005 7:48:42 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

NASCAR could go linear! Nnnnaoooowwww there goes the pack!



LOL..... look quick


30 posted on 01/01/2005 7:52:26 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Southern States obviously have their mind made up on business growth continuance.
What has been confirmed by red voting State maps primarily in the South is business expansion above and beyond blue voting States.
Nothing wrong with planning to keep feeding what's already in growth motion to keep unemployment dropping further.


31 posted on 01/01/2005 8:08:49 PM PST by hermgem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
I've never been an enviro-whacko, but the thought of a quarter mile of asphalt and concrete running through the countryside so somebody, somewhere else can get their junk cheaper, does not appeal to me.

As I said many years ago, the only benefit Texas will see out of Nafta is one hell of a freeway, at OUR expense.

32 posted on 01/01/2005 8:09:12 PM PST by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
I've never been an enviro-whacko, but the thought of a quarter mile of asphalt and concrete running through the countryside so somebody, somewhere else can get their junk cheaper, does not appeal to me.

As I said many years ago, the only benefit Texas will see out of Nafta is one hell of a freeway, at OUR expense.

33 posted on 01/01/2005 8:09:42 PM PST by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

The Local and State government are always behind in road planning. They let areas get developed without creating a plan of action to have the infrastructure grow with the defined area. You end up with an area that is fully developed with 20 year old infrastructure. Throw in constant utility upgrades were parts of the streets get ripped up ever few months by (insert utility company name here). You get a big headache from constant construction.


34 posted on 01/01/2005 8:16:01 PM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nyboe
THE LAST THING WE NEED IN TEXAS IS FRICKIN TOLL ROADS !

Yeah! What do these private investors think they're doing? Everyone knows that only the government can do things right.

35 posted on 01/01/2005 8:21:29 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Spain huh.This is going no where. He better start talking to American Companies and fast. Texans love the Land. They'll keep this tied up in court till Perry is in anursing home.


36 posted on 01/01/2005 8:33:04 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neb52

From the location shown on the map. this is not going to happen in my lifetime. he is essentially trying to destroy Texas. Bush didn't like him now I know why. I see he wants to make it easier for the illegals to get to Houston. actually it's the port, but this is untenable.


37 posted on 01/01/2005 8:39:37 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

This is not about SS or Gov. it's about the land.


38 posted on 01/01/2005 8:41:40 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas; Dubya
I've never been an enviro-whacko, but the thought of a quarter mile of asphalt and concrete running through the countryside so somebody,

It isn't just highway. It has double tracked railroad, utilities, space for future high speed trains, four lanes of truck traffic, and six lanes of cars plus other rights of ways. I'd rather have a well thought out set of corridors than a hodgepodge of ill-connected expanded freeways. When was the last time you travelled down I-35 between San Antonio and DFW? Why should people from the valley or the Gulf Coast have to travel all the way to Austin in order to get to Dallas?

39 posted on 01/01/2005 8:47:40 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Supporters say the corridors are needed to handle the expected NAFTA-driven boom in the flow of goods to and from Mexico

I wouldn't bet the farm on Mexico trade.Asia, China and India is acing them out of the picture. Better build more ports.

40 posted on 01/01/2005 9:02:31 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson