Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL

This is horrible.

I have no sympathy for wife abusers.

But EVERYBODY is going to suffer because of this.

The reason the judge rescinded the divorce is so the child will not be illegitimate.

But it is NOT HER HUSBAND'S BABY.

It is these laws that make ex-husbands have to pay child support for babies that are not theirs, because their wives cheated on them.

I understand why these laws exist and why husbands should at one time have to support the children of their wives.

But times have changed, it is a whole new ballgame.

She doesn't want to be married to him. He doesn't want to be married to her. They should not be forced to stay married just so a child that IS NOT HIS will have to bear his name and he will have to be responsible.


7 posted on 12/31/2004 8:02:48 PM PST by DameAutour (Yes, I know what my problem is. My problem is I'm right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DameAutour

Yup. What you said.


8 posted on 12/31/2004 8:03:26 PM PST by Tax-chick (To turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson