Skip to comments.
Bar code scanners facing unlucky number (USA-Canada to switch to 13 digit Euro standard barcodes)
sunherald.com ^
| Posted on Wed, Dec. 29, 2004
| STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS
Posted on 12/31/2004 3:56:52 PM PST by Destro
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
12/31/2004 3:56:53 PM PST
by
Destro
To: Destro
"This isn't like a Y2K thing," said Dave Hogan, chief information officer for the National Retail Federation. "The world's not going to stop on Jan. 1, 2005." Well, then it's exactly like the Y2K thing, isn't it?
2
posted on
12/31/2004 4:01:43 PM PST
by
ScottFromSpokane
(We're none of us prefect.)
To: Destro
It's only temporary. I read somewhere in the past few turns that the world is going to a 14 or more (can't remember) digit code.
What's luck got to do with it?
3
posted on
12/31/2004 4:04:33 PM PST
by
Dust in the Wind
(I've got peace like a river . . .)
To: ScottFromSpokane
Universal Bar Code ... The History Channel's been running a Countdown to Armageddon series ... Mark of the Beast anyone?
4
posted on
12/31/2004 4:05:06 PM PST
by
sono
To: sono
I think that's a 666-digit code.
5
posted on
12/31/2004 4:06:26 PM PST
by
ScottFromSpokane
(We're none of us prefect.)
To: sono
"Mark of the Beast anyone?"
Yep, when they tattoo that sucker on your forehead.
To: Dust in the Wind
Correct - they are working on a 14 digit one as a world standard.
7
posted on
12/31/2004 4:12:04 PM PST
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: Dust in the Wind
I was afraid of the mark of the beast crowd - which will miss the obvious - America exports so little now that the EU is setting the world standard - That is how I see it.
8
posted on
12/31/2004 4:13:31 PM PST
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Max Combined
10
posted on
12/31/2004 4:16:53 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Destro
Sooo; it would be unfortunate (unlucky?) to invest in the 3,500 dollar scanners only to need new ones in a few years to read the new code, right.?
11
posted on
12/31/2004 4:16:54 PM PST
by
Dust in the Wind
(I've got peace like a river . . .)
To: ScottFromSpokane
We invented the barcode technology. Screw them. Let them hire teenagers to screw up their cash registers again.
12
posted on
12/31/2004 4:17:44 PM PST
by
Thebaddog
(Dawgs on the coffee table.)
To: Destro
Unlucky? Give me a break.
To: ScottFromSpokane
Ok, I'm confused.
With the old 12 line standard; the bars repeated from the middle to the outside, such that the code would be 123456654321 for an item with the code 123456. This was done such that the bar code couldn't be read 'upside down', which would confuse 123456 with 654321.
So, with 13 lines, the middle code must now be 1234567654321. So, if this is the case, then what would be the benefit to going to 14 lines instead of 13?
14
posted on
12/31/2004 4:19:13 PM PST
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: Destro
When will this madness end!?! God forbid the scanner can't read a 12 digit bar code number and now the grocery clerk will have to physically key in a 13 digit code!!?? AHHHHAAAAAA!!!!!!!
To: Max Combined
when they tattoo that sucker on your foreheadhow about when it's implanted in a chip under the skin of our right hand? That system is already in use in Europe and fits the biblical description of how the mark will be applied.
16
posted on
12/31/2004 4:20:17 PM PST
by
Former Fetus
(aren't we all?)
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: Destro
I work for a firm that imports some raw materials and exports approx. 10% of our finished product. The CEO has been reluctant to use the bar codes we already have on the product even though the tracking and up to date inventory control gains would be well worth the effort. I've yet to ask if he's holding off for the 14 digit or just thinks his help will be too hard on the scanners. hahaha
18
posted on
12/31/2004 4:24:31 PM PST
by
Dust in the Wind
(I've got peace like a river . . .)
To: Dust in the Wind
$3500 Ouch! Is that for a cash register combination?
How much for a hand held reader?
To: Dust in the Wind
Sooo; it would be unfortunate (unlucky?) to invest in the 3,500 dollar scanners only to need new ones in a few years to read the new code, right.?I wouldn't think so. It's image recognition, with each bar being either 2x, 3x or 4x the width of the single line. Thus, each bar can represent 4 possible values (as I understand it).
So, 6 lines each representing 4 bits equals 24 bits; or 16,777,216 possible values. That's a LOT of UPC registered products.
Whether the scanner is reading 12 or 'x' lines is simply a software issue. The interesting part is that the lines are read as ratios relative to each other, hence you can find bar codes that are large (as on cardboard boxes) or small (like laserprinted decals). Either way, as long as the lines all fit within the scan width; the scanner can read them.
20
posted on
12/31/2004 4:25:56 PM PST
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson