Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bar code scanners facing unlucky number (USA-Canada to switch to 13 digit Euro standard barcodes)
sunherald.com ^ | Posted on Wed, Dec. 29, 2004 | STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS

Posted on 12/31/2004 3:56:52 PM PST by Destro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
North America uses the 12-digit Universal Product Code (UPC), while much of the rest of the world adopted the 13-digit European Article Number (EAN). As a stepping-stone, the Uniform Code Council that governs the UPC system, and its European counterpart EAN International, launched an initiative in 1997 that they called Sunrise 2005. Its deadline is Jan. 1, 2005. “We have true globalization of business now,” said Al Garton, director of channel management for the UCC.
1 posted on 12/31/2004 3:56:53 PM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Destro
"This isn't like a Y2K thing," said Dave Hogan, chief information officer for the National Retail Federation. "The world's not going to stop on Jan. 1, 2005."

Well, then it's exactly like the Y2K thing, isn't it?

2 posted on 12/31/2004 4:01:43 PM PST by ScottFromSpokane (We're none of us prefect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
It's only temporary. I read somewhere in the past few turns that the world is going to a 14 or more (can't remember) digit code.

What's luck got to do with it?

3 posted on 12/31/2004 4:04:33 PM PST by Dust in the Wind (I've got peace like a river . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane

Universal Bar Code ... The History Channel's been running a Countdown to Armageddon series ... Mark of the Beast anyone?


4 posted on 12/31/2004 4:05:06 PM PST by sono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sono

I think that's a 666-digit code.


5 posted on 12/31/2004 4:06:26 PM PST by ScottFromSpokane (We're none of us prefect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sono
"Mark of the Beast anyone?"

Yep, when they tattoo that sucker on your forehead.
6 posted on 12/31/2004 4:10:24 PM PST by Max Combined
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dust in the Wind

Correct - they are working on a 14 digit one as a world standard.


7 posted on 12/31/2004 4:12:04 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dust in the Wind

I was afraid of the mark of the beast crowd - which will miss the obvious - America exports so little now that the EU is setting the world standard - That is how I see it.


8 posted on 12/31/2004 4:13:31 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Max Combined

10 posted on 12/31/2004 4:16:53 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Sooo; it would be unfortunate (unlucky?) to invest in the 3,500 dollar scanners only to need new ones in a few years to read the new code, right.?
11 posted on 12/31/2004 4:16:54 PM PST by Dust in the Wind (I've got peace like a river . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane
We invented the barcode technology. Screw them. Let them hire teenagers to screw up their cash registers again.
12 posted on 12/31/2004 4:17:44 PM PST by Thebaddog (Dawgs on the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Unlucky? Give me a break.


13 posted on 12/31/2004 4:18:58 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane

Ok, I'm confused.

With the old 12 line standard; the bars repeated from the middle to the outside, such that the code would be 123456654321 for an item with the code 123456. This was done such that the bar code couldn't be read 'upside down', which would confuse 123456 with 654321.

So, with 13 lines, the middle code must now be 1234567654321. So, if this is the case, then what would be the benefit to going to 14 lines instead of 13?


14 posted on 12/31/2004 4:19:13 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Destro

When will this madness end!?! God forbid the scanner can't read a 12 digit bar code number and now the grocery clerk will have to physically key in a 13 digit code!!?? AHHHHAAAAAA!!!!!!!


15 posted on 12/31/2004 4:19:25 PM PST by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined
when they tattoo that sucker on your forehead

how about when it's implanted in a chip under the skin of our right hand? That system is already in use in Europe and fits the biblical description of how the mark will be applied.

16 posted on 12/31/2004 4:20:17 PM PST by Former Fetus (aren't we all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Destro

I work for a firm that imports some raw materials and exports approx. 10% of our finished product. The CEO has been reluctant to use the bar codes we already have on the product even though the tracking and up to date inventory control gains would be well worth the effort. I've yet to ask if he's holding off for the 14 digit or just thinks his help will be too hard on the scanners. hahaha


18 posted on 12/31/2004 4:24:31 PM PST by Dust in the Wind (I've got peace like a river . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dust in the Wind

$3500 Ouch! Is that for a cash register combination?
How much for a hand held reader?


19 posted on 12/31/2004 4:25:30 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dust in the Wind
Sooo; it would be unfortunate (unlucky?) to invest in the 3,500 dollar scanners only to need new ones in a few years to read the new code, right.?

I wouldn't think so. It's image recognition, with each bar being either 2x, 3x or 4x the width of the single line. Thus, each bar can represent 4 possible values (as I understand it).

So, 6 lines each representing 4 bits equals 24 bits; or 16,777,216 possible values. That's a LOT of UPC registered products.

Whether the scanner is reading 12 or 'x' lines is simply a software issue. The interesting part is that the lines are read as ratios relative to each other, hence you can find bar codes that are large (as on cardboard boxes) or small (like laserprinted decals). Either way, as long as the lines all fit within the scan width; the scanner can read them.

20 posted on 12/31/2004 4:25:56 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson