Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fatalis
Thus my concept of sweetening the pot by getting the illegals some bonus points by having to give up their jobs to the vetting process, and deport themselves, with the understanding that many of them will get them back. The idea just popped into my head. For Bush to just say no, and have no bill passed, might prove a painful choice for him. It might just push him over the edge.
427 posted on 12/31/2004 3:18:09 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
Thus my concept of sweetening the pot by getting the illegals some bonus points by having to give up their jobs to the vetting process, and deport themselves, with the understanding that many of them will get them back. The idea just popped into my head. For Bush to just say no, and have no bill passed, might prove a painful choice for him.

The problem is that Bush's entire public premise is that his proposal is compassionate without rewarding people for breaking the law. Yes it's a dog and pony act, but he's been selling tickets for years and many have paid the price of admission.

Your compromise would entail a lesser, but possibly more obvious reward to illegal aliens. Bush's best shot, from his perspective, will be to maintain the charade and try to strong arm this thing. He's got a big hurdle getting it past Sensenbrenner in Judiciary, not to mention Tancredo's 70+ votes and Hastert's reluctance to do and end around of his own caucus.

Bush might back down, but he's been girding himself for this fight for five years, so it will require a bitter fight and defeat for him to do so. I hope I'm wrong, because I think David Frum is right.

434 posted on 12/31/2004 3:32:02 PM PST by Fatalis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson