My agendas are two. The first is Roman Catholicism as it was taught to me in the 1950s (not at all pacifistically inclined). The second is the Sharon Statement of Young Americans for Freedom. You can find it on YAF.com or YAF.org, one or the other. One is Young Americans for Freedom. The other is a foundation run by YAF alumni. In cases of conflicts (which I have yet to ever discover), Catholicism rules.
Anyone whose agenda is abortion AND birth control AND snowbird socialism AND lavenderism AND gun controlism and tax hikism NEEDS to be cleansed. Give them 6 months to leave for Canada or any other country large enough for them not to control before the cleansing begins. The USA started as a free country and, by damn, needs to restore that freedom whether you want welfarism for your grandma or not. Whatever your grandma gets is going to "illegals" as well. See the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection clause. It is in all the constitutions. We are conservatives. Welfarism needs to go away permanently for everyone including grandma.
I had really hoped to ignore you starting several posts ago. If I stop posting, do not assume that I agree. Disagreeing with you except on the wages subissue is my default position.
Ronald Reagan (Ronaldus Maximus) ran the cupboard down. He rebuilt the military and particularly the 600 ship Navy. It became less possible to fund the welfare state as a result. He was democratically elected and re-elected (massively in both cases) in case you have forgotten. Do you really think that overwhelming social service programs will end this form of American socialism??? If so, that's one more reason to bring in the Mexicans. Sounds like a plan.
I am loyal to the United States and not to Mexico. I am somewhat less enthusiastic now during the Abortion Holocaust Era than I used to be before it.
While you are obsessing over the borders, do you have a practical plan for ending abortion and alternative lifestyles other than importing socially conservative voters to punish the "I am personally opposed BUT...." crowd and take back the Supreme Court and do to the social issue left what they have done to 1.5 million babies per year for thirty-two years now.
As to whether the end justifies the means, you could raise that question to Injustices William O. Douglas, Herod Blackmun, Potter Stewart, Lewis Powell John Paul Stevens, Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, Swish Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer and some others but most of them are as dead as the 45 million babies whose murders they and others arranged. Since Roe vs. Wade and until its suppression by overrule, the rule of law is DEAD in America. So, don't appeal to the law. I am certainly willing to act democratically. Why else would it be necessary to bring in social conservatives? Newsom broke the moral law. Whether he broke California's law in judicial theory remains to be discovered by the California Supremes. One ought not to be optimistic given the contortions regularly utilized by our courts to abolish the remains of Western Civilization.
Reading between the lines, you want more Mexicans because they are socially conservative, and will be part of the coalition to enact laws, or form mobs, to drive what you consider socially liberal Anglos out of the United States (you know, the folks that favor legalized contraception and the like) as part of a "cleansing" action. Is that a fair characterization?
So you believe in freedom. Just anyone who disagrees with you needs to be "cleansed" within six months.
You support illegal immigration because you think that if America can become a majority Catholic country then "cleansing" (i.e., getting rid of all those Protestant degenerates and thereby avenging the Irish Famine) can be advanced. Sorry, pal. The Hispanics of today aren't the hyper-Catholic Irish of a century ago. And given that most immigrants are poor, why should they be opposed to social services ? The GOP has never done well with immigrant groups because immigrants, generally being poor, want lots of social services.
Ronald Reagan never really touched middle class entitlement programs. He didn't because he knew the American people would have a fit if he touched Medicare, Social Security, deductability of mortgage interest, etc. I know it upsets the rightness of you true believer types to live among the wicked, but freedom means working by persuasion, not "cleansing" people out or waging ethnic warfare against this nation. Abortion is an evil, but I smell in you the greater evils of terrorism and totalitarianism due to your fundamental lawlessness and contempt for consent of the governed.
You need to sit down, read the Constitution, and take a very, very basic civics lesson.