Apparently you think it is racist and "anti-Mexican" to insist that laws be enforced. There is nothing the least bit conservative about that. Apparently you are willing to destroy the quality of life in our border states to facilitate access to cheap labor. There is nothing the least bit conservative about that.
Your hysterics are reminiscent of a 60's knee-jerk liberal insisting that people worried about crime in the streets were "racist". In your fulmination about California social spending you have your own version of "root causes".
I spent the late 60s and early 70s being a state chairman of Young Americans for Freedom. Preserving your socialist programs to preserve your "lifestyle" is not a form of conservatism I have ever heard of. Identifying crimes not as crimes with perpetrators but as crimes with perpetrators of specific ethnic origins is a problem. If more burglaries were committed by blacks than would be proportional to theior numbers in society, it does not make burglary a "black" crime.
All the whining about crime on immigration threads is baloney since plenty of us are not too squeamish about "forgetting" unreported income when filling out those forms on April 15. So get off the phony high horse. Stupid laws are stupid laws. Often they die by being ignored. Immigration laws have always (since the 1880s) been enacted to control which races and nationalities get to enter the US in which proportions. To suggest otherwise is to be ignorant of history.
You would not know "conservative" if it jumped up and bit you.