"You stated that the judging of a candidate based on their views of homosexuality constitutes intolerance. "
OK, so you've managed to twist my words to make ME out to be an intolerant bigot. I'm not sure I can play in these semantical Major Leagues, but I'll give it another shot.
I think if you don't like a particular agenda, that's OK with me. If you don't want to vote for a candidate because he has, for example, curly hair - that's your right. But if you want to exclude him from your party because some of his beliefs differ from yours, or his hairstyle, I think that constitutes intolerance.
You wanna give "intolerance" a different definition, be my guest. Or, it occurs to me that you may want to re-define "Republican" to fit your set of beliefs.
The indoctrination of our country's youth by gay activists isn't comparable in significance to a candidate's hairstyle, though individuals like yourself would love for us to believe as much.
You didn't need my help in exposing yourself as a bigot. You did a fine job on your own.
You might find a warmer reception on DU. Tell them we said "hi."