Guys who wear glasses are four-eyed sissies, aren't they? If one bits one's lower lip, like Clinton does, one shows compassion, right?
Nothing you've posterd here is relevent in the real world. Not even where you speak for me. Imagine that?
Steve Forbes has a very interesting message, but he's unelectable. Remember the Iowa straw poll back in 1999? Where he outspent everyone by a TON and still did miserably bad? Plus, he's never held elective office. And on top of all that, regardless of his glasses, he's a dork. That's the simple truth.
Or...Do you really think Dennis Kucinich is electible regardless of his appearance? Lots of libs bash other libs for speaking the cold, hard truth about him too.
Sorry if you don't agree with reality, but that's not my problem.
Well, if Steve Forbes wanted to create a macho image, he could always borrow unfit John Kerry's Goose hunting gear, can't he? False images, PC facades and stereotypes are not reliable references for the presidency.
Guys who wear glasses are four-eyed sissies, aren't they? If one bits one's lower lip, like Clinton does, one shows compassion, right?
"Nothing you've posterd here is relevent in the real world. Not even where you speak for me. Imagine that?"
My sarcasim does not "speak for" you. Obviously, it soars over your lack of imagination.
"Steve Forbes has a very interesting message, but he's unelectable...Plus, he's never held elective office. And on top of all that, regardless of his glasses, he's a dork. That's the simple truth."
Forbes positive attributes:
Has interesting message; has never held an elective (political)office; wears glasses and is not a demagogue.
"Sorry if you don't agree with reality, but that's not my problem."
Your sense of reality is merely an expressed biased ("dork") assessment of Forbes based on your superficial ("dork") value system. You've been watching "West Wing."