Skip to comments.
Nuclear Capabilities May Elude Terrorists, Experts Say
The Washington Post ^
| December 29, 2004;
| Dafna Linzer
Posted on 12/30/2004 5:04:03 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
1
posted on
12/30/2004 5:04:04 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
The article is correct.
Nuclear weapons require nations. bin Laden isn't there.
The biological and chemical weapons DON'T elude him. Those are very buy-able, usable and do-able. Hussein's use of them proved that.
To: starfish923
The biological and chemical weapons DON'T elude him. Those are very buy-able, usable and do-able. Hussein's use of them proved that.
I'm unaware of Hussein using any biological weapons.
And chemicals are a pretty bad terror weapon. When Hussein used them on Halabja he had complete military control of the area and the application took a whole day and a fleet of aircraft and artillery.
To: neverdem
Mistake a defending force can make regarding an enemy: (check one)
(1) Overestimate the enemy's potential;
(2) Be overprepared militarily; or
(3) Underestimate an enemy's ability.
4
posted on
12/30/2004 5:25:58 PM PST
by
weenie
(Islam is as "dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog." -- Churchill)
To: Strategerist
You are correct about the biological weapons not being used by Hussein. But, they are easier to manage because they can be put in water supplies. I can't think of too many reservoirs and water departments in THIS country that have heavy security. Maybe I'm wrong here. I don't know.
The chemical weapons, I do believe, are still not beyond bin Laden. If he even managed to kill 100 Americans with a smallish attack, that would be W-A-Y too many.
It would be a suicide attack too, of course. THAT is the biggest problem that we have to deal with. There is dang little protection against suicide attacks. MOST sane human beings want to live and AREN'T willing to die for their cause. He manages to find the most disenfranchised youth and cultivates their hatred of the U.S.
He also probably pays their families a ton of money.
He has to be caught...him and Al-Zarqawi.
To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; King Prout; ..
From time to time, Ill post or ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.
6
posted on
12/30/2004 5:36:00 PM PST
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: starfish923; neverdem
Many water supply systems start in reservoirs that are above ground and some have bridges over them. Easy to toss something out a window.
7
posted on
12/30/2004 5:38:54 PM PST
by
GeronL
(I am NOT the real bin Laden)
To: neverdem; All
The article is vague.....
.......Except:
......Of all the clues that Osama bin Laden is after a nuclear weapon, perhaps the most significant came in intelligence reports indicating that he received fresh approval last year from a Saudi cleric for the use of a doomsday bomb against the United States.........
.....'doomsday' bomb.......means every/any kind of 'WMD'.....
This approval is the 'Authority' for 'use' forever against the 'infra-structures' of the U.S.A. constitution!
There will NOT.....can NOT,..... EVER be 'truthfulness' in 'mutual'....trust,....given the Official Authority of 'Deception' as an Official Religious Worldview.
(The mutual denial of 'Absolute' moral truth...)
'Post-modernism is the Confusion of Islam'
.....Total Victory is the only 'sure' goal.....
This 'WMD' Authority-Deceptions Authorization is the ONLY guarentee of 'Submission'.
IMO
8
posted on
12/30/2004 6:01:25 PM PST
by
maestro
To: starfish923; neverdem; PhilDragoo
If we don't have a civilizational conflict on our hands, then no problem, right? [/sarcasm]
9
posted on
12/30/2004 6:04:42 PM PST
by
risk
To: risk
Iran is racing to build nuclear weapons.
Iran is the premier state sponsor of terrorism.
Iran places America in the ten-ring as the Great Satan.
A fatwa was recently issued clearing OBL to use nuclear weapons on America.
So if the Washington Post says "nuclear capabilities may elude terrorists" we can all go skiing with Kofi Annan.
Or not.
10
posted on
12/30/2004 6:15:13 PM PST
by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: PhilDragoo
A fatwa was recently issued clearing OBL to use nuclear weapons on America.I think you are correct in every way but one...America's Achille's heel is Israel (or more specifically, Jerusalem)...That is most likely the target.
11
posted on
12/30/2004 6:54:20 PM PST
by
weenie
(Islam is as "dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog." -- Churchill)
To: weenie; PhilDragoo; Yehuda; yonif
America's Achille's heel is Israel (or more specifically, Jerusalem) I still think the feather in their cap would be Manhattan. That way they get Jews, people who work with them, choice realestate in the Big Apple, and the apparent core of our international commerce center to boot. But they'll find it much harder to shut down international commerce today than they did in 2001. It's much more distributed now. Jerusalem is also a city they'd like to have, so it may be somewhat of a deterrent for them when they think about destroying it.
Jewish life is distributed, too.
12
posted on
12/30/2004 7:31:35 PM PST
by
risk
To: risk; USF; Happy2BMe; JudyinCanada; jan in Colorado; broadsword
I spent a large part of my life in Manhattan. I love New York...but it ain't Jerusalem...
Islam could take a swipe at Judaism and Christianity with one shot...they think.
Iran has already announced their intention to strike Jerusalem (I have been looking for source with no luck so far).
The challenge to Islam is Jesus and Adonai and the Holy Spirit...the American left is no threat to Islam.
13
posted on
12/30/2004 7:39:47 PM PST
by
weenie
(Islam is as "dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog." -- Churchill)
To: weenie
14
posted on
12/30/2004 7:42:36 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
("Islam fears democracy worse than anything-It castrates their stranglehold at the lowest level.")
To: weenie
[The] American left is no threat to Islam. Actually it is. More than just Christianity, Islam is the enemy of the Enlightenment. The left is a bastardization of the Enlightenment's focus on the individual. Islamists would want to crush and flick aside the left after the obstacles presented by the Christian right would be neutralized, much like a black widow killing her mate.
This is why President Bush says we're in a war against terrorism, not against a religion. We're in a war against people who refuse to let religion be a matter of personal choice.
15
posted on
12/30/2004 7:45:11 PM PST
by
risk
To: neverdem
Nuclear weapons are not simple devices nor are they cheap. To build one you need to not know know a lot of stuff (expertise in physics, explosives, geometry, metallergy, electrical engineering and more) but you got to have access to the materials to make the weapon.
If terrorists were going to build their own bomb it would probebly be a crude version of the unraium gun weapon used over Hrioshima. It is far simpler than the multi-point implosion bomb but is notoriously inefficient. You would need several critical masses to get any rspectable yield. Just one critical mass only equals 10 tons of TNT (this was used in the Davy Crockett tactical bombs). A ready-made bomb from russia or china is a far better option for terrorists but any nuclear device, wether bought or built would be detected by US radiation detectors.
To: risk; USF; Happy2BMe; jan in Colorado; broadsword; JudyinCanada
I am still thinking about your comment...but I think Islam is most afraid of the light (and the light they are afraid of is not enlightenment in the sense of the left...) Islam is afraid of the spiritual light...the Light of Truth.
The light (enlightenment) of the left is flickering...it is the light of atheism.
The light that endures is the light of the Jews and the Christians...read it and weep!...I do.
17
posted on
12/30/2004 7:55:38 PM PST
by
weenie
(Islam is as "dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog." -- Churchill)
To: weenie; jan in Colorado
Iran has already announced their intention to strike Jerusalem (I have been looking for source with no luck so far). You mean when Ayatollah Rafsanjani slipped up and said:
"If a day comes when the world of Islam is duly equipped with the arms Israel has in possession, the strategy of colonialism would face a stalemate because application of an atomic bomb would not leave any thing in Israel but the same thing would just produce damages in the Muslim world"... "Jews shall expect to be once again scattered and wandering around the globe the day when this appendix is extracted from the region and the Muslim world..."
???
18
posted on
12/30/2004 7:56:52 PM PST
by
USF
(I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
To: USF; weenie; risk; dennisw; SJackson; MeekOneGOP; TrueBeliever9; Geist Krieger; JohnHuang2; ...
Arabs Prove Islam Is a Lie
I just looked over transcripts of some Arab 'educational' material and couldn't believe what I'd read. According to Palestinian educational television, Islam is a lie based upon lies. Of course, they never actually say this, but if one extrapolates the absolute 'truths' they present, this is the only conclusion that can be drawn. Below are just some of their illogical or damning teachings (depending upon your point of view) drawn from these latest diatribes. But first, some facts:
It is undisputed fact that Islam regards Jesus as a prophet.
It is undisputed fact that Jesus was Jewish.
Let's start with something very, very basic -- something even the two esteemed historians who presented the material, Dr. Jarir Al-Qidwa, Head of the Palestinian Authority Public Library and Arafat's Advisor on Education, and Dr. Issam Sissalem, Senior Historian and Educational TV host and former head of the history department of a PA university, can understand.
According to the website Islam101:
"He (Jesus) and his followers used to worship in the temple which other Israelites used. The message of Jesus was to call people back to the religion of Abraham and Moses from which they had gone astray."
And:
"Based on the statements of Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W.), Muslims believe that Prophet Jesus will return to earth at a time when Muslims will be in a dire need of a leader."
And:
"The Holy Quran also gives a detailed account of the mission and lives of Jewish prophets like Moses and Zakarea (Zechariah)."
Meanwhile, both Dr. Al-Qidwa and Dr. Sissalem state that there is no such thing as Judaism nor that Jewish King Solomon's Temple existed:
Al-Qidwa: "The Temple is the fruit of their (Jewish) imagination."
If what these two 'learned' individuals claim is true, then Islam, which claims Jesus (who was a Jew) as one of their main prophets and future saviors, is based upon a lie.
At the same time, the statements of Dr. Al-Qidwa and Dr. Sissalem fly in the face of facts proven by legal expert and erstwhile Judaism researcher Dr. Nabil Hilmi, Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Al-Zaqaziq. In the August 9, 2003 edition of the Egyptian weekly Al-Ahram Al-Arabi, Dr. Hilmi stated that he takes as fact the Bible's account of the Exodus. In the article, he refers to "what is written in the Torah.... in Exodus, [Chapter] 35, verses 12 through 36
"
That Dr. Hilmi tried use these facts as the basis to sue every Jew on the planet for gazillions of dollars is immaterial. That he clearly stated in his interviews that he had verified the factual aspects of the Bible, even using the Egyptian police to do the detective work is significant. Dr. Hilmi has stated that the Hebrew Bible is fact, and that the Jews of today are absolutely the descendants of the Jews of yore. This alone flies in the face of what Drs. Al-Qidwa and Sissalem present:
Sissalem: "I want to point out that we should not focus much on what is called the [Biblical] Hebrew tribes, who are in fact Bedouin Arab tribes. There is no connection between them and these Khazar Jews [of Israel today]. Those [Hebrew-Arab] tribes were erased and ceased to exist and no traces were left of them..."
If nothing else, Dr. Sissalem has negated Dr. Hilmi's lawsuit against modern-day Jews by saying that we have no relationship to the Jews enslaved for hundreds of years by the Egyptians. It also implies, by extension, that if the Egyptians want to sue for return of goods ostensibly stolen from the ancient Egyptians, they should be suing the Bedouins. Unless of course, Drs. Sissalem and Al-Qidwa are wrong....
Further along, a very damning statement comes from the esteemed Dr. Sissalem: "...the Bible expresses a tradition of legends, that has no connection to history." (emphasis mine - BG)
Notice how he didn't state 'little connection,' or even 'only partial connection.' Dr. Sissalem stated very clearly the word "no". Yet, if one reads the Koran, it clearly states that Abraham settled, by God's command, in the place of what would become the Ka'ba (22, 27).
Since Dr. Sissalem stated that the Bible has "no connection to history," any mention of certain individuals and even groups from the Bible must be false. Therefore, since the Koran mentions Abraham, it must be a lie, too. The same holds true for other individuals and groups mentioned in the false piece of literature, the Bible, as well as the Koran. Such people as Ishmael and Moses, and groups such as the ancient Egyptians. Therefore, the words of Mohammed, as written down in the Koran, are based upon a lie.
This aforementioned statement even negates the rest of these learned men's arguments that the 'Palestinians' are the descendants of the Canaanites and therefore entitled to take away Israel's land from the Jewish people and claim it for their own: "...when our nation or our Canaanite forefathers came to Palestine."
Since the Canaanites are extensively written about in the Hebrew bible, according to Dr. Sissalem, there is no such thing as Canaanites, since the Bible has "no connection to history."
This means that the Palestinian claim of being the ancient Canaanites is a lie.
In essence, Drs. Al-Qidwa and Sissalem have not merely proven that the Koran is a lie, but that their very own contemporary scholars and statesmen are citing falsehoods when they quote the Koran, since it frequently mentions people and places mentioned in the Bible, which, as they will tell you, has no connection to history.
So instead of discrediting the Israel and the Jews, these two distinguished Arab experts have proven that Islam is a lie based upon lies. Bravo. Who knew you were working for us?
19
posted on
12/30/2004 8:01:14 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
("Islam fears democracy worse than anything-It castrates their stranglehold at the lowest level.")
To: USF
That and some statement that Israel and Christianity would be destroyed by a strike against the Holy City...yet Islam (because of its wide geographic distribution) would suffer only a small setback.
In case I have overlooked it today...
Allah Fubar and death to Satan/Allah.
20
posted on
12/30/2004 8:01:29 PM PST
by
weenie
(Islam is as "dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog." -- Churchill)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson