So let's see, the government of the most prosperous nation on the planet cannot give aid to the nations hit by this catastrophe - that also means no logistical support (since it would cost money), no military cargo planes to deliver supplies, etc. Well, some of the planes can stop by for a few minutes to rescue any Americans that happen to be there - oh wait, that wouldn't be OK either, since it would violate the Constitution, right?
So, our fleet and planes just cruise by the islands, snap some photos and say: "good luck, we're all pulling for you! Real soon now every American will be sending you some money, blankets, Beanie Babies for the kids - well, at least those of you that survive the next couple of weeks will benefit from the generous relief of private American citizens."
Hogwash! I'm ashamed that some of you consider yourselves part of the American Conservative movement. Some of you need to get your heads on straight.
So tell me - should we be spending money to rebuild Iraq? Where in the Constitution does it say that spending money in that manner is OK? By your absurd theory, the U.S. government could NEVER spend one cent to provide foreign aid? That is about the dumbest thing I have ever heard.
I'll stick with the Constitution as far as controls on government spending are concerned. As an individual I do and will donate to causes and charities I feel worthwhile.
Btw, I don't think the writers of the Constitution were dumb, sorry you do.
"So let's see, the government of the most prosperous nation on the planet ........"
In case you havn't noticed, we (the gooberment) are currently in debt past our collective eyeballs.