Replies

To: SF Republican

How about that? In the article, its "1,00,000."

16 posted on 12/30/2004 12:27:40 PM PST by Tarpaulin (Look it up.)

To: Tarpaulin

How about that? In the article, its "1,00,000."

Probably supposed to be 100,000 since a million would be too large a jump.

36 posted on 12/30/2004 12:41:39 PM PST by Netizen (jmo)

To: Tarpaulin

which could be true 1,00,000 is 1 lakh

73 posted on 12/30/2004 1:53:07 PM PST by camas

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794