[jonestown]

Luis Gonzalez wrote:
So far, both the Second Amendment Foundation and the Constitution Foundation say that you don't know what the hell you're talking about

---

Feel free to have that opinion, Luis.
Actually, both of your cites agree with my version of our RKBA's, not yours.
-- It is the public policy of the United States, as per the 2nd Amendment, to prevent infringements on our RKBA's.

Employers are cynically using 'parking lot property rights' to prevent employees from carrying arms. - Which leaves the question.. -- Why does anyone support such efforts?

[Luis Gonzalez]

"Actually, both of your cites agree with my version of our RKBA's, not yours."

You're flat out stupid son.

"Similarly, we have no right to carry a gun onto a the property of a person who forbids the act."

"It is a fundamental principal in law that the owners or managers of real property have the power to regulate who may enter their premises, and to set conditions upon their entry. That includes public property. Citizens have a right to keep and bear arms -- on their own property or property they control -- but not on someone else's property without his permission."

"Likewise if your employer says, "No gun on the job," and you violate his rule, you will be fired. The employer, as the person in control of the property, has the right to set this rule."

The first quote is from my third cite, the second quote is from my second cite, and the third from my first cite.

None support you, they actually destroy you.