Nonsense is what best describes your entire argument on this, even your most ardent supporter has changed positions on this.
You have no right to enter my property at all, so if you don't like my conditions, don't enter, and your rights AND MINE are safeguarded.
Luis, who is being "deprived" of what; --
-- when an employer is told that he can't infringe on his employees right to carry arm's in the vehicles they drive to work?
jones
You're being deprived of the right to freely use someone else's property on your own terms, and since you don't have that right, you are deprived of nothing.
56 Luis
Nonsense, -- the employer is unreasonably attemping to deprive employees of a basic right to carry arms.
Our RKBA's is protected by law..
57 jones
Nonsense is what best describes your entire argument on this ---
You have no right to enter my property at all, so if you don't like my conditions, don't enter, and your rights AND MINE are safeguarded.
58 Luis
You have no 'right' to infringe on an employees right to carry arm's in the vehicles they drive to work.
Our RKBA's is protected by law.