Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush 'presumes' U.S. warning system is adequate
Investor's Business Daily ^ | 12/29/04 | Corbett B. Daly

Posted on 12/30/2004 9:07:30 AM PST by M 91 u2 K

Bush 'presumes' U.S. warning system is adequate By Corbett B. Daly Last Updated: 12/29/2004 4:04:35 PM

WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) -- President Bush said he presumes the U.S. warning system for tsunamis and other natural disasters is in working order, but he stopped short of definitively backing the infrastructure currently in place.

"I presume that we are in pretty good shape. I think our location in the world is such that we may be less vulnerable than other parts, but I am not a geologist, as you know," Bush told reporters in Crawford, Texas.

"I can't answer your question specifically: Do we have enough of a warning system for the West Coast? I am now asking that to our agencies and government to let us know," Bush said in response to a question about the U.S. warning system as he made his first public comments since the devastating earthquake and ensuing tsunamis that have so far killed 75,000 people in Asia. See full story.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; eastcoast; tidalwave; tsunami
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
A warning system is the least the government could do just incase this were to ever happen. The chances maybe low that a tsunami could hit here by why take that chance with so many lives at stake.
1 posted on 12/30/2004 9:07:30 AM PST by M 91 u2 K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K

What about the East Coast? Do we have a warning system for the East Coast?


2 posted on 12/30/2004 9:10:06 AM PST by areafiftyone (Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K
This treats Bush and government as an insurance agent that guarantees nothing bad will happen, but if it does, they will keep us whole. Sad
3 posted on 12/30/2004 9:11:16 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K
"... but I am not a geologist, as you know,"

If only the people would have elected the brilliant John Francois Kerry, we wouldn't have to put up with this.

4 posted on 12/30/2004 9:11:19 AM PST by ReadyNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K

Well, obviously Bush doesn't care about America. Insensitive to the core. Why isn't he leading an effort to stop all tsunamis everywhere? Why did he allow the tsunami to hit all those countries?


5 posted on 12/30/2004 9:11:52 AM PST by MisterRepublican ("I must go. I must be elusive.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

Was it Bush or Haliburton? Or Both?


6 posted on 12/30/2004 9:13:19 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K

Why don't we also get a meteor warning system while we're at it? Sheesh.


7 posted on 12/30/2004 9:17:51 AM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K
The bigger question is, Did Bush have knowledge of the tsunami before it struck and why did he fail to act in time to save 100,000 lives?
8 posted on 12/30/2004 9:18:11 AM PST by Liberal Bob (http://democrap.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K

Let's see. He has had 9/11, Iraq, the election, homeland security and 1000 other things to be concerned with. I rather doubt that tsunami warnings have been at the top of his list.

Even if we already have effective systems in place, why should he have direct knowledge of them?

We shouldhave a warning system in place. I suspect we do based on some articles I have seen lately, but it is pretty hard to plan ahead for every single eventuality of nature.


9 posted on 12/30/2004 9:25:24 AM PST by arjay (If the NYT is against it, it must be good for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReadyNow

That's what comes of all those vacations spent at the Crawford Ranch, instead of studying geology as he should.

Dan


10 posted on 12/30/2004 9:26:58 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ReadyNow

Right, Kerry would have a "plan", of course no one would ever know what it is.


11 posted on 12/30/2004 9:27:38 AM PST by lolhelp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

I read a letter to the editor in my local paper where this woman said pretty much that. The administration is spending so much money on war and equipment that we should have bought these poor people tsunami warning devices instead. In effect US and Bush's fault. Sick isn't it?


12 posted on 12/30/2004 9:35:46 AM PST by vpintheak (Liberal = The antithesis of Freedom and Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: M 91 u2 K

The Pacific Coast of the US is well-protected by a good warning system. Tsunami warnings or alerts go to all law enforcement and fire officials if there is a need.

I remember at least three tsunami alerts from my time living in a coastal community in central California.

I do not know about the East coast.


14 posted on 12/30/2004 9:55:56 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K
Many news reports I have seen in the last few days say:

Maybe the President was making a fatal mistake; believing major news organization reports.

15 posted on 12/30/2004 9:57:34 AM PST by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
"That's what comes of all those vacations spent at the Crawford Ranch, instead of studying geology as he should."

Maybe it's Rummy's fault, after all he is the Secretary of Defense and I imagine that includes earthquakes/tsunamis etc. /sarc>

16 posted on 12/30/2004 9:58:58 AM PST by WestCoastGal ("If you can't run with the big dogs, you'd better go sit on the porch." (Daytona 52 days);-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
A true "government" response to this would be to make human habitation within 10 miles of any coastal area illegal...

It's for your protection...

17 posted on 12/30/2004 10:00:37 AM PST by Ferris (Man must soon come to grips with the power of his own consciousness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K
Oh good grief. With a small amount of effort they could do a Google search they could find out the answer...

The Pacific has an underwater tsunami-detection system of six buoys nestled strategically on the ocean floor at depths of up to 18,000 feet. Three of the devices are off the Aleutian Islands in Alaska, one is off Vancouver, British Columbia, one is off Oregon and one is between Hawaii and Chile.

The gauges on the ocean bottom are linked to buoys on the sea surface, which transmit date to a satellite, said Gerard Fryer, a University of Hawaii geophysicist who is also the adviser to the Hawaii Department of Civil Defense.

Two of the three sensors off the Aleutians are currently not working because the surface buoys, which are battered by the rough winter seas, need to be replaced, he said.

Source

Danged lazy media...

18 posted on 12/30/2004 10:00:54 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Danged lazy media...

It's not that they're lazy, or incapable of doing a 30 second Google search. It's that they want to throw a loaded question at the President in the hopes of him making a mistake or showing ignorance of the system.

With his uncertain answer, they now have the ammunition to go after him for his ignorance and insensitivity - just like they did with Rumsfeld. He obviously doesn't know what is going on in his own Administration, does he?

Bush is an ignorant, uncaring dolt, again!!... plainly outed by our relentlessly efficient and nonpartisan MSM, who, after all, are just trying to get the facts and report the unbiased news to the American People. Just doin' our jobs, Ma'am.

Expect breathless news clips at 6, followed by accusatory editorials in all the Newspapers Of Record!

19 posted on 12/30/2004 10:18:18 AM PST by Gritty ("The moral and intellectual pretense of the American liberal is a thing to marvel upon-RE Tyrrell,Jr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All

The East Coast needs a warning system also even if the chance is low their is no need to take a stupid risk.


20 posted on 12/30/2004 10:24:13 AM PST by M 91 u2 K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson