You're acting like they invalidated the whole pre-nup. They didn't. Just one aspect of it. He still has all the assets he brought to the marriage...
Let's face it - to expect a woman, who stayed home and raised your children and made a home for you, to just "move on" and be able to support herself after you tire of her is just wrong. Period. Anyone who says otherwise isn't much of a man.
IMO, this is the most important aspect.
Should I ever be insane enough to pop the question, that term will definitely be written into my prenup. Along with one which states that all additional wealth derived from the management of the previously owned capital assets remains with the original party.
>>Let's face it - to expect a woman, who stayed home and raised your children and made a home for you, to just "move on" and be able to support herself after you tire of her is just wrong. Period. Anyone who says otherwise isn't much of a man.<<
Tow things: first, she actually acquired quite a bit of assets in the divorce settlement. Second, how do you know he dumped her, and not the other way around. Did you know that over 75% of divorces in the US are filed by the wife?
Third, the prenup was protecting his income when SHE WAS NO LONGER HIS WIFE.