1 posted on
12/29/2004 8:06:01 PM PST by
woofie
To: woofie
I read today that the expected animal deaths in the coastal areas hit by the tsunami have not been discovered. This could be due to the fact that rescue/reporting has been focused on human casualties. But I the article mentioned that many animals might have "sensed" the threat in time and moved inland, thus saving themselves. I wonder if this will be proven.
2 posted on
12/29/2004 8:14:17 PM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Time to let slip the dogs...)
To: woofie
Bilek said the quake was unusual because the size of the wave seemed large relative to the size of the quake.
"You might not have expected it to produce a large tsunami," she said. She and her colleagues have been studying the seismic conditions that distinguish subduction earthquakes that produce big tidal waves from those that don't. Well, hmmmmmmmmmmmm... curious.
10 posted on
12/29/2004 9:27:30 PM PST by
exhaustedmomma
(Tancredo said Bush's guest-worker proposal is "a pig with lipstick")
To: woofie
Is it too soon still to make a Michael Moore joke?
14 posted on
12/29/2004 11:25:47 PM PST by
fire_eye
(Socialism is the opiate of academia.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson