To: Mount Athos
The only reason that I felt that this was newsworthy was due to the fact that it is in an area that isn't known for earthquake activity.
Being a second generation Californian I have been in numerous big quakes.
To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
OOOHHH Good point, I was thinking of that earlier.
To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
....but isn't 25 miles close enough to Mammoth that it wouldn't really be significant? I mean , if it was in New York or Texas, or Florida, I would say that is really something!!!! but 25 miles? hmmmmm
The only reason that I felt that this was newsworthy was due to the fact that it is in an area that isn't known for earthquake activity.
48 posted on
12/29/2004 9:02:01 PM PST by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
The only reason that I felt that this was newsworthy was due to the fact that it is in an area that isn't known for earthquake activity. a 3.6 that is 25 miles away from Mammoth Mtn and you are calling it a seismically quiet area? First 25 miles isn't squat geologically for influences. Secondly, what time frame are we looking at? I suspect that there have been more quakes in the area than you are aware of.
51 posted on
12/29/2004 9:25:44 PM PST by
Godzilla
(You're jealous because the voices speak only to me.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson