That would be the deathnell for the Democrats. As it was, 100,000 votes in Ohio could have given John Kerry the election even with a 3+ million vote defecit in the popular vote. These DUmbasses can't see past their "election fraud" blinders.
Like it or not, Dianne, you're stuck with the flyover people.
Dangerous, dangerous, dangerous. The US will be a far, far, different place if they ever manage to pull this off. I would predict that it will change the US in ways that, in the end, the Democrats will hate.
So she wants to replace a few battle ground states with a few urban centers? Let's see, who resides in the states and who resides in the urban centers? I think things are just fine.
As expected, the dictatorial-oriented Left will seek, once again, to eliminate one of the best systems in place to prevent mob rule from destroying our Republic. Let her go down in flames as other previous attempts by these lunatics have. Long live the Republic.
Undermining the Constitutional is all the National Socialist want to do. Time to get them out of office!!
[[groan]]
Ha, the demwit knows how hard it will be for her party to win in the electoral college process in the future.
You may not believe it but many Freepers apparently don't mind the idea.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1309093/posts
Amazing.
That's because unless we let California and New York vote for everybody in this great country they'll never see a DemocRAT in the white house again!
It will never happen. There are too many small states whose representation in the Electoral College is larger in proportion to their population. Voting for this amendment would reduce their citizen's voting power. Why would they do that? Since an amendment needs 38 states to pass, it's just not going to happen.
Just goes to show that if they can't get a judge to rule in their favor its times to declare the Constitution null and void.
Obviously Diane knows better, than our Founding Fathers. (sarcasm)
It's almost as if they don't know they're losers!...Can they be that dumb?
As much as I would like to see Feinstein removed from government, abolishing the Senate is not something I would support.
If our Founders knew the mischief that would be committed by Congress, there would be three houses in the US legislature instead of just two and supermajority votes would be required for many classes of legislation.
Interesting 'Rat definition of disenfranchisement: in effect, if the candidate you vote for loses, you've been disenfranchised.
I pray that the 'Rats keep this up for four more years (and way beyond).
This would be a precursor to another civil war.
Well, then.
We'll just filibuster this little act of tyranny and refuse to give it an up or down vote.
Done.
And George Bush wants to amend to the Constitution to say:
Marriage is between a Man and a Woman! - (Going Nowhere)
And some want foreign born eligible for President - so-called Schwartzenegger Amendment - (Going Nowhere)
And some want the Abortion Amendment (Going Nowhere)...
Showboating by Feinstein (Ach Weh!)