Here's a post I made in March 2002 explaining punk eek to someone who didn't understand it at the time. (I'll refrain from speculating how much has changed since then.)
I saved it under the heading "My personal punk-eek example." Note the particular hypothetical I chose for illustrative purposes. I mention it now because you seem to be crowing over catching us "once again changing our story."
Still, way to go! You've discovered punk-eek! Someday you may know something about evolution. (Of course, you'll probably go to Hell for it.)
I remember that post very clearly, despite it not being addressed to me. When I see a reference to punk-eek, I pull up your explanation in my mind. I will say you are an effective communicator considering I still clearly remember your summation.
I can see how this idea is attractive to those who are confined to a materialistic explanation for reality. It attempts to explain the unexplainable, couched in scientific terms.
I still don't understand why you choose to confine yourself in that way, considering the supernatural evidence that surrounds us.
I just cruised through that thread. Brings back memories. I had forgotten about the "Shroud of New Jersey." And old No-Kin was still around then.