Forgive me if the word "sloppiness" offended you. However, you did state (or rather, quoted another as stating) that "
our interpretations of Genesis 1 have enough uncertainty that either position is possible."
Because you have endorsed the notion that there is sufficient uncertainty within Genesis to permit either an old earth or a recently created earth, I presume you also endorse the notion that there is sufficient uncertainty within Genesis to permit evolution as well. If not, why not?
"... you did state (or rather, quoted another as stating) that "our interpretations of Genesis 1 have enough uncertainty that either position is possible." Because you have endorsed the notion that there is sufficient uncertainty within Genesis to permit either an old earth or a recently created earth, I presume you also endorse the notion that there is sufficient uncertainty within Genesis to permit evolution as well. If not, why not?" If you really want the answer to the question you keep asking, you will need to read what I wrote in #197. (This will be the third time I have referred you to it.)
You will notice that I plainly say that Genesis 1 does NOT permit Darwinianism (MACRO-evolution).