Asserting creation is NOT a deliberate false assertion!
>evolution predicts the existence of no such fossils<
Then I assume you can explain WHY evolution should be believed without this evidence?
You: "Then I assume you can explain WHY evolution should be believed without this evidence?"
The theory of evolution does not predict the existence of "fossils of cats turning into dogs, seals & walrus turning into whales." Thus, the nonexistence of such evidence does not falsify the theory. Kinda' rudimentary.
Your insistence that the theory does to predict the existence of such fossils does not make it so. Perhaps you are unwittingly expressing heartfelt disagreement with a theory that you have fabricated out of ignorance. I, for one, don't believe that. I think you are disagreeing with a theory that you are deliberately misrepresenting, and that you are deliberately misrepresenting it to achieve some goal.
Which brings me back to the questions (which I will modify slightly to accommodate this most recent assertion of yours):
What is your goal in deliberately misstating the theory?
Do you advocate such a deliberate misstatement of the theory to students?
And how do you reconcile Biblical admonitions against dishonesty with the deliberate dissemination of falsehoods to unsuspecting students?