Well if you read my initial post you would see that I don't attempt to explain creation.
Instead, I suggest that creationists focus on exposing the lack of science associated with explaining evolution.
post 191 tried to overwhelm with a volume of print.
When the volume is examined , it fails.
Where are the pic's of the supposed fossils of one species in transition to another?
Giving a latin name to a series, and assert one begat the other is falacious.
I am assuming that you know full well that the theory of evolution predicts the existence of no such fossils, and indeed, if such fossils were found, the notion of special creation would be profoundly advanced.
Yet you argue that the theory of evolution is falsified by the nonexistence of these fossils.
Now go back to my questions. What is the goal of this deliberately false assertion? Do you advocate making such false assertions to students? And how do you reconcile Biblical admonitions against dishonesty with the deliberate dissemination of falsehoods to unsuspecting students?