Skip to comments.
Human Sacrifice Was Common In Burnt City (Iran)
Payvand ^
| 12-27-2004
Posted on 12/28/2004 3:15:07 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
12/28/2004 3:15:07 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Well, looks as things sure haven't changed since then.
2
posted on
12/28/2004 3:17:29 PM PST
by
LauraleeBraswell
(Support our troops.........)
To: SunkenCiv
3
posted on
12/28/2004 3:17:32 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
See, Father Abraham was onto something ~ bet a whole big bunch of folks back in his day were sick of their tribes being hunted down for use in human sacrifices.
4
posted on
12/28/2004 3:18:09 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 4ConservativeJustices; ...
Thanks Blam. Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
5
posted on
12/28/2004 3:21:13 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(It's a big planet. We're willing to share. They're not. Out they go.)
To: LauraleeBraswell
"Why did they have to kill the dogs?"
PETA is on the case.
6
posted on
12/28/2004 3:29:56 PM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: blam
7
posted on
12/28/2004 3:33:58 PM PST
by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: blam
...and they're still at it.
8
posted on
12/28/2004 5:00:17 PM PST
by
Savage Beast
(This is the choice: confrontation or capitulation. Appeasement is capitulation.)
To: muawiyah
If Moses was 1450 bc, then when was Abraham?
Add 400 years of slavery, add lifetime of Joseph, Jacob, Isaac, and Abraham....roughly 900 years???
That puts us back to 2300 bc or so....some 4300 year ago. We're still off by 700 years.
9
posted on
12/28/2004 5:04:08 PM PST
by
xzins
(The Party Spirit -- why I don't take the other side seriously!)
To: xzins
Yup, it was still going on. What you see there in the "burned city" is the ground floor.
You give people a chance they'll start sacrificing somebody else every single time.
10
posted on
12/28/2004 5:07:18 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: blam
11
posted on
12/28/2004 5:08:18 PM PST
by
valkyrieanne
(card-carrying South Park Republican)
To: muawiyah
12
posted on
12/28/2004 5:23:19 PM PST
by
xzins
(The Party Spirit -- why I don't take the other side seriously!)
To: SunkenCiv
Why is it called the "burnt city"?
13
posted on
12/28/2004 6:02:02 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
To: BenLurkin
Maybe someone left the stove on.
14
posted on
12/28/2004 6:17:00 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
("The odds are very much against inclusion, and non-inclusion is unlikely to be meaningful." -seamole)
To: SunkenCiv
Wait a minute . . . you're supposed to know the answer to these things!
15
posted on
12/28/2004 6:25:35 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
To: BenLurkin
It's true, it's true. If I don't know the answer, I can be counted on to make up a plausible lie. Usually. In this case, I'm still puzzling over something else that seems obvious, and crucial to our understanding. Why isn't the city known as "Crushed by the tires of a giant SUV"?
16
posted on
12/28/2004 6:43:16 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
("The odds are very much against inclusion, and non-inclusion is unlikely to be meaningful." -seamole)
To: BenLurkin
The Burnt city One of the most ancient sites in Iran is The Burnt City, located in the Eastern part of the country, South of Zabol in the region of Sistan. The unexpected appearance & the quick disappearance of the city baffled experts for years.
According to the excavations and researches, the Burned City has come to be known as one of the most important proofs of the independence of the eastern part of Iran from Mesopotamia.
Judging by the artifacts recovered in the area, the inhabitants seem to have been a race of intelligent people who were both farmers & builders of various crafts.
So far no military ware has been discovered, suggesting the peaceful nature of the residents. What is really strange about burnt city is the fact that it has no connection to any other old civilisations in the area, as if it completely came from elsewhere.
One of the prominent relics found in the Burned City is a skull that according to the anthropological studies, is the first evidence of brain surgeries in prehistoric Iran.
17
posted on
12/28/2004 6:46:25 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Antediluvian or survivors perhaps.
18
posted on
12/28/2004 6:48:30 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
To: blam
the quick disappearance of the city baffled experts for years
(snip)
So far no military ware has been discovered ...And they see no connection between these two things?
19
posted on
12/28/2004 9:37:11 PM PST
by
knuthom
20
posted on
10/01/2005 9:34:20 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson