Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They’re not Insurgents – They're Terrorist Cockroaches!
THE RANT.US ^ | DECEMBER 28, 2004 | J. MATT BARBER

Posted on 12/28/2004 11:02:15 AM PST by CHARLITE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: USF; weenie

insurgent ping


21 posted on 12/28/2004 4:08:26 PM PST by jan in Colorado (Merry Christmas! Jesus . The Savior of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BackInBlack
In that case, the people attacking our troops in Iraq are insurgents after all, and NOT terrorists...the only ones who are terrorists are the ones targeting civilians?

I would agree with your statement. I would also refer to those who ONLY attack Iraqi civil and military targets and coalition targets as insurgents.

As soon as they start purposely killing civilians, they are terrorists.

Same as in the North of Ireland. As long as the IRA aimed their attacks at the British military they were acting as insurgents. When they started blowing up hotels and pubs, they were terrorists.

The key her is the willful murder of civilians. Any group or individual, who willfully kills noncombatants to achieve political goals is, in my opinion, a terrorist.
22 posted on 12/29/2004 3:15:42 AM PST by Beckwith (John, you said I was going to be the First Lady, as of now, you're on the couch . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961; Beckwith

You both have described the tactics of the terrorists, and, of course, you are right on target. I do not disagree with you at all on that point.

Are you both suggesting that the goals of the terrorist insurgents (see, terrorist very nicely modifies the word insurgent) is NOT to bring an end to the current government? If you are suggesting that, I disagree.

Dr Watson (that's you Publius), please note that the terrorist insurgents have been targeting more and more those arms of the government known as the police and the army recruits. You kind of made my point for me.


23 posted on 12/29/2004 4:38:05 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Both the Administration and the military have widely used the term "insurgents". They may well be echoing the MSM. I don't know who started it first.

If they want to change the tune, they should stop using the word and use a more appropriate word, like "terrorists". They are also at fault here for the constant use of the word.

We have become so obsessed with not offending anybody, we don't even want to offend our enemies. Heaven forbid we make them mad at us!

24 posted on 12/29/2004 5:20:14 AM PST by Gritty ("This guy (Bush) in office is an uneducated, real lying schmuck... he started a jihad!-Chevy Chase)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jan in Colorado

Interesting "insurgent" vs "terrorist" vs "koranimal" debate. Thanks for the ping.


25 posted on 12/29/2004 5:02:18 PM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson