Posted on 12/28/2004 10:40:37 AM PST by pissant
Unemployment in the United States appears set to fall next year by nearly 10 percent, the Christian Science Monitor reported Tuesday.
And job creation looks robust, too. Employers are expected to create as many as 225,000 new jobs each month in 2005 to more than absorb the 125,000 who enter the job market every month, economists predicted.
An informal survey of economists indicates that unemployment could fall from its current 5.4 percent to as low as 5 percent, a nearly 10 percentage point decline.
"It may be the best year since 2000 in terms of the general job market," predicts Mark Zandi of Economy.com. "There will rising labor force participation and fewer underemployed."
Reasons for the optimism includes an unusually high number of businesses that are flush with cash, the expiration of the government's accelerated depreciation benefit on capital investments and the slowdown in downsizing.
"Each year downsizing is dropping off about 20 percent," says John Challenger whose firm in Chicago, Challenger, Gray & Christmas, keeps track of announced layoffs.
If Kerry was elected, he would be taking credit for this...
More to the point, they said the tax cuts would not help, and in fact would make things worse.
So much for that....
I just started a new job last week after leaving an existing position.
My old boss thought that he could still low ball salaries and treat employees like it was September 12, 2001.
So, I activated my Monster account, and went from a contract position, to a perm position with a very promising startup, with a 12% salary increase and gobs of stock options.
Same deal here. My boss basically caught me sending out my resume so he said they will be bumping up my pay shortly. I am goin to ask for like a 30-35% increase.
Your old boss will catch on soon enough. We do need some miserly types to help keep inflation in check. Congrats.
Good luck.
More & more I'm seeing "help wanted" signs.
More & more i'm hearing from my friends that all they want is for people to show up and they'll train them.
I've been off work since May 2004....Mainframe dinosaur..
I couldn't get arrested. After Thanksgiving, I got a ton of hits.
I start the new position 1/3/05.
Happy New Year to all......
Trust in God, hang in there and it will happen.
How many more jobs need to be created to erase all the jobs lost? I believe it was below a million before the election and that was before the strong report for October.
excuse to get votes for socialist backwards hat give aways
Good story & good luck!
I think the accellerated capital depreciation actually harmed job creation by making investing in capitol improvements more attractive than hiring.
Thanks. I've been severely underpaid for the past 2 years and they know it.
"I think the accellerated capital depreciation actually harmed job creation by making investing in capitol improvements more attractive than hiring."
Perhaps, but now we are shifting to a point where they must hire to remain competitive. As Martha would say, "that's a good thing".
"I think the accellerated capital depreciation actually harmed job creation by making investing in capitol improvements more attractive than hiring."
First of all, it's CAPITAL improvements - not "capitol."
Second, what do you think it takes to make those improvements happen? People.
Nice spelling flame. As Thomas Sowell points out, economics is the allocation of scarce resources that have alternative uses. You can hire a new factory worker, or you can buy a machine that does his work. If the government is essentially subsidizing the second option then you are going to get more of the second option.
But Bush won, and the account gimmick is ending, and the economy will probably be strong through 2008, so I'm a happy camper.
"Nice spelling flame. As Thomas Sowell points out, economics is the allocation of scarce resources that have alternative uses. You can hire a new factory worker, or you can buy a machine that does his work. If the government is essentially subsidizing the second option then you are going to get more of the second option. "
...for which the manufacturer of machines needs to hire more employees, and the buyer of machines (and the economy as a whole) see increased efficiency and higher productivity. How awful. ;)
I picked on your spelling, btw, because not only don't you understand basic economic principles, you can't spell them either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.