It used to be like this:
Nothing but potato.
Posted on 12/28/2004 3:28:39 AM PST by white trash redneck
Website administrators can swap the image for unauthorized posters.
Their server software senses if the request is authorized and, if not, substitutes a tattle-tale or an offensive pic like in this case.
Thanks.
But see Jerusalem Post:
Sri Lanka Ambassador Diffa Digeratna said Tuesday morning: "We are very thankful to the government of Israel for providing those facilities to Sri Lanka."
He said that due to logistical constraints and "the lack of accommodations in Colombo" (the capital), his government had requested that Israel send a reduced delegation.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1104204632909
Interesting.
It used to be like this:
Nothing but potato.
I hadn't read the Post yet this morning. Thank you for the update. It is good to see that Israeli aid, whether from teh IDF or not, is not truly being refused.
There is absolutely NO reason why India or Sri Lanka should be anti-jewish or anti-isreal.....beats logic.
I have to admit, I almost fell out of my chair laughing when I saw the picture. That was hilarious
"No, but I understand the sentiment. American fast-food joints have RUINED the french fry. It used to be different.
It used to be like this:"
And to add insult to injury the Americans are blaming the French for it. LOL!!
I agree. Anti-Israel would only make sense for political or commercial reasons, certainly not religious or cultural reasons.
"There is absolutely NO reason why India or Sri Lanka should be anti-jewish or anti-isreal.....beats logic."
I have no reason to disagree.
"Looking at a hierarchy of suffering some people just can't see the truth. "
No, what people are seeing (to their disgust) is that while these people suffer, a nation is refusing the assistance of another nation. A nation, I might add, that is very capable of lending such assistance.
The same happened when Iran was hit by an earthquake--they refused US help. If these nations wish to do that, they ought to quit the griping.
As for Israel giving money to put in a Tsunami alert system---Sri Lanka and India and Thailand didn't heed warnings from the US Tsunami centre at Honolulu (BTW, the US doesn't charge for such warnings) These nations were far more concerned with tourist dollars than common sense---and look at the price they paid.
archives
January 9, 2004
Iran refuses Israel's aid
Editorial
When the massive earthquake levelled the town of Bam, in Iran, killing an estimated 30,000 people, the world's aid agencies and governments moved into action to offer what they could of humanitarian aid. A question immediately arose about whether the fundamentalist Islamic government of Iran would welcome assistance from the United States, the "great satan" with whom Iran has had ill relations since 1979. No sweat, came the response, Iran will accept aid from any country – except the "Zionist regime."
Iran's astonishing refusal to accept assistance from Israel is a tangible statement on the contempt with which Israel is detested in that country, a hatred that is commonly held throughout the Muslim world.
The hatred of Israel is so intense that Iran's theocratic rulers will actually sacrifice the lives of its own citizens just to snub the "Zionist entity." We don't need to review the whole history of the region to appreciate the nuance of this refusal. Iran's leaders hate America, but are willing to accept humanitarian support from it. Israel, on the other hand, is considered so utterly contemptible that even potentially life-saving assistance is unwelcome. Others can parse the meaning of this rejection and find complex explanations perhaps, but there is no answer really beyond plain and visceral hatred of Jews and their national state.
This is no issue of mere principle, either. History has made Israel one of the world's top sources of expertise in disaster relief and crisis management. Saving lives – and rehabilitating disabled people who might otherwise die – is an area where Israel, sadly, has been forced to develop state-of-the-art procedures. To reject Israel's assistance is to reject the best expertise in the world. It will no doubt have the effect of allowing Iranian earthquake victims to die unnecessarily.
As disturbing and self-defeating as Iran's choice is, the world's silent reaction to it has been deafening. There was almost a twittering of excitement that American aid workers would be allowed into Iran, as though this symbolized some wonderful new epoch in international relations. Iran's decision should have brought the Islamic regime in Tehran to a new low in international esteem, but North American and European observers and governments have made almost no criticism of Iran's rejection of Israeli help. This is not such a great surprise. Western leaders have been turning a blind eye to Arab and Islamic anti-Semitism for decades.
There are, however, two small silver linings in all this. Israeli aid workers have proven themselves the better humanitarians, seeking ways to "smuggle" Israeli aid in through non-Israeli non-governmental organizations such as the Red Cross. Israeli agencies like Latet will not allow the decency and humanity inherent in relief efforts to be extinguished by anti-Semitism.
More significant in the long term may be the historical impact of major natural disasters on political conditions in a country. Failure to respond adequately or to oversee the fair and equitable distribution of foreign aid has ended more than one regime. The botched response to a massive earthquake several decades ago in Nicaragua is credited as a lynchpin in setting off the conditions for a revolution. The vulnerability or arrogance shown by a government in a time of genuine national emergency can solidify or destroy its hold on public support or tolerance.
Before the earthquake, hopeful observers had suggested that Iran is on the verge of a democratic breakthrough. The arrogance of Iran's refusal to accept Israeli aid reinforces the fundamental fact about Iran's Islamofascist regime: ideological hatred trumps the security of Iranian citizens. Because protecting the safety of its citizens is a government's top priority, the rejection of Israeli assistance goes to the very heart of the legitimacy of Iran's government.
If any good is to come of this disaster, let it be that the base inhumanity of Islamic fundamentalist regimes like Iran's are seen for what they are by foreign observers and, ideally, by Iranians themselves, who are chafing, and dying, under totalitarianism.
Latest news suggests over a hundred IAF officers and men may have perished at an Indian airbase in Malucca.
I just saw a report on that, and I'll try to go and get the article.
maybe the good lord has spoken to the Muslims.
They really had no realistic way of implementing the warnings anyway.
Well, there is that. I believe Americans invented the superior Crinkle-Cut fries, though these days everyone serves the inferior, French-style shoe-string variety.
Still, it was American food-cops who insisted that McDonalds stop cooking them in beef tallow...a moment that marked the end of American fry superiority.
Don't even get me started on that nasty Belgian habit of putting mayonnaise on french fries. [vomit] That's an abomination.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.