Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freespirited
I have seen these mailbox addresses explained as what homeless persons use as addresses to have something to fill in. This seems to be a black hole into which anything can be thrown. How can they prove that these are bogus, or are they possibly really homeless folks filling out these forms?

Someone needs to get their arms around this latest DemonRat scheme.

6 posted on 12/27/2004 8:55:22 PM PST by keithtoo (Defeat Le' Partie' Democratique)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: keithtoo
I have seen these mailbox addresses explained as what homeless persons use as addresses to have something to fill in. This seems to be a black hole into which anything can be thrown. How can they prove that these are bogus, or are they possibly really homeless folks filling out these forms?

It's not clear to me that it matters what the excuse is. If you go to the original post at soundpolitics.com (scroll down to about the fourth entry) there is a link to the law imbedded in the original post. As you can see, the law requires that the address on the registration be where the person actually resides. If the mailbox address isn't where the person actually resides, the registration may well be invalid.

It could be that the city has some arrangement for homeless people--perhaps they are supposed to give the address of a shelter where they are known--but I'm going to take a WAG that using a private maildrop or storage locker isn't the proper procedure.

14 posted on 12/27/2004 9:06:49 PM PST by freespirited (Kerry ravaged the reputation of Vietnam vets in a manner reminiscent of a creepy liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: keithtoo

I still had the link open. Here is the law about the address requirement:

http://www.leg.wa.gov/RCW/index.cfm?section=29A.04.151&fuseaction=section


16 posted on 12/27/2004 9:09:59 PM PST by freespirited (Kerry ravaged the reputation of Vietnam vets in a manner reminiscent of a creepy liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: keithtoo
Hundreds of bogus registrations found in Seattle

What next???

''Sun to rise in East tomorrow''?

Tape at 11. (yawn...)

The only interesting thing here is that it took the King County version of Tammany Hall fully 52 days to steal the election.

24 posted on 12/27/2004 9:38:25 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: keithtoo
OK I think I just found the law as it would apply to homeless people:

WAC 434-208-100 Registering to vote -- Nontraditional address. No person registering to vote, who meets all the qualifications of a registered voter in the state of Washington, shall be disqualified because of a nontraditional physical address being used as a residence address. Nontraditional addresses may include shelters, parks or other identifiable locations which the voter deems to be his/her residence. Voters using such an address will be registered and precincted based on the location provided. Voters without a traditional address will be registered at the county courthouse, city hall or other public building near the area that the voter considers his/her residence. Registering at a nontraditional address will not disqualify a voter from requesting ongoing absentee voter status provided the voter designates a valid mailing address.

In other words, they can't use a private mailbox or storage locker.

30 posted on 12/27/2004 9:47:54 PM PST by freespirited (Kerry ravaged the reputation of Vietnam vets in a manner reminiscent of a creepy liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: keithtoo
I feel so absolutely sure that it was this wandering pack of non-residents that the Rat party hooked up with that got Maria Cantwell elected by the the mere 2000 "provisional" votes that came in late from Kink co......

what ever happened to having to establish residency in a place before you could vote...like 6 months or so?

a citizen who LIVES in an area for a required amount of time has more invested in that area.....and as the theory goes, more apt to take his or her voting choices seriously.....

Democrat party is the fraud party, no question about it....

40 posted on 12/27/2004 11:16:05 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson