Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

I dunno guys.... i'm not much for conspiracy theories.... but i still think that flight was shot down by our jets due to the debris field being so large and i also think TWA-800 was shot down (by terrorists with shoulder fired rockets.... too many people saw con-trails)


22 posted on 12/27/2004 8:13:17 PM PST by Andrew LB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Andrew LB
"i still think that flight was shot down by our jets due to the debris field being so large"

want to back that up with a link???

27 posted on 12/27/2004 8:18:20 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©® - Dubya... F**K YEAH!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Andrew LB
but i still think that flight was shot down by our jets due to the debris field being so large

Please post a man of the debris field.

52 posted on 12/27/2004 9:13:14 PM PST by Howlin (Annoy a liberal; tell everybody you see Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Andrew LB
Okay. . .ONCE MORE for the nuts: It was not shot down. It was never intercepted. The jets were screaming over the Mach to intercept but never made it.

Air traffic controllers, weapons dumps, weapons loaders, Wing MOCs, Wing Ops, Squadron schedulers, the pilots themselves and their squadron mates, crew chiefs. . .this means literally hundreds and hundreds of people would know if a missile was fired and a jet was shot down. . .for goodness sake, think about it. . .no way you could keep anything of that nature quiet. "We" would know.

But for conspiracy people, the lack of proof is proof of how good the cover-up actually is.

IT WAS NOT SHOT DOWN.

Jets break up under high G, and jets, if shot down, spread over miles and miles and miles of area. This wreckage was localized and "clean." A small amount of parts will be projected here and there, and parts may fail and fall off the jet when under high G (such as rolling and pulling at a high rate of speed when fighting for control). Basically, jets fold and crumple when stressed outside their design parameters or G limits. THAT is why some parts fall off pre-impact.

For a jet flying into the ground at a high angle the wreckage is small and localized. . .like this was. It is clear the jet impacted the ground nearly vertical. Therefore, it did not break up widely in flight. Jets are crepe-paper when compared to cars.

Sheesh. . .no more of this nut-job conspiracy stuff, please, we are better than this.
90 posted on 12/28/2004 7:20:41 AM PST by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson