The problem is, that we never got close enough and the plane went down before we had the opportunity to down it. (which, we would most certainly have done, given the chance)
Now this I consider plausible. Does it make me abandon my scepticism of an Air Force take-down? Not yet. I kind of like the idea of being a nut. It opens all kinds of avenues to discussions.
Perhaps, but it seems a waste of energy unless something substantive comes from it. Nothing comes from this. The families deserve closure and the government, congress and others have many more things to be attentive to.
Flt 800 and the tail (falling off) incident are perhaps a bit different, as one involves a administration that we knew to be bought and paid for and corrupt, and the other involves an aircraft made in Europe that is still flying in our airspace if it is truly defective.
I for one, have been affected by these incidents and the ramped up security, as I refuse to fly any longer. If I can't drive, I do not go. So these issue do interest me, but I cannot find anything to give me reason to doubt the official line on this particular incident and even if I did, I would weigh it against the continued grieving of surviving families, and the benefits of a continued investigation, if any at all..