Posted on 12/27/2004 4:10:00 PM PST by Lindykim
The following quote from Patrick Gray, in 'Aborton Rhetoric & Common Sense," appeared in 'Touchtstone,' Apr. 2004
"...anyone who defends the practice of abortion must posit a state of limbo, a literal no-man's land somewhere between life and death, between human and nonhuman, inhabited exclusively by embryos and fetuses."
Superstition is the rejection of common sense and the corruption of reality. It's belief in the absurd....in whimsy, and wishful thinking. It's the redescription of reality in order that its' adherents can believe in their own fanciful conceits. Because adherents of abortion must redescribe and even deny reality in order to allow themselves to support and to engage in a practice that ends human life , by definition then, their reasoning falls into the category of superstition.
Since they cannot admit that abortion kills a human life during any stage of its' development, they must deny that reality by redescribing life in terms that dehumanize it. Life becomes an 'it' called an embryo,a collection of cells, a zygote, or a fetus. Death and killing are redescribed as termination. At no time can this 'thing' be thought of as being alive, for to do so is to admit that 'something' dies......that a life has been put to death. And at all times, we are encouraged to think of the ongoing development of this nonhuman 'thing' as something that may or may not become 'viable', which seems to mean that at some mystical moment the 'it' has magically become humanlike.
Some pro-death types wish to believe that even after birth and up until one year of age, that the 'collection of cells' given birth to lacks something called 'personhood' and as a result, is still not a bona fide human being. Of course what they're really saying by way of mumbo-jumbo, is that if the personhoodless 'collection of cells' is displeasing or unwanted for whatever reason, then 'it' can still be 'terminated'. And we are not to ask....."Where does this 'thing' called personhood come from if it is not already existing within the baby....er,uh.. "thing"? Was it perhaps floating around in some unseen dimension while waiting for a personhoodless body to be born?"
In listening to Court TV's feminist talking heads voicing their outrage towards Scott Peterson, I wondered at their inability to see their own disattachment from reality. Had Laci not been murdered, and rather than anxiously looking forward to Connor's birth had she decided instead to exercise her pro-death 'choice' option and have Connor 'terminated' at a state sanctioned killing center, Court TV"s feminist talking-heads would have given her their full support. So what was the real source of their outrage?
In the final analysis, 'choice' is an innocuous sounding but deceptive facade behind which lurks a malignant disregard and vulgar disrespect for human life. By denying the intrinsic value, inherent dignity, and unique spirituality of human life, it adulterates the value of human life by categorizing it as just another animal.
Thus, just as we choose to own a pet or choose not to own one; choose to have it 'put down'; choose to abuse it; or choose to welcome it and love it, we've been seduced into believing that we can make similar choices with regards to unborn human beings. But, in order for us to continue to believe in this corrupt fairytale, we must not allow truth to intrude upon our consciences. Therefore we must deny reality and truth and accept the grossly absurd and distorted in their place. And just as we are not to question whether 'stepping on a crack will break our mother's back,' we dare not question the horrible absurdities of 'choice.' So we must perforce, believe in its' veracity much as we do any other superstitiously held belief. Blindly......without thinking about it.....and in a perpetual defensive mode
ping
You have the choice to have sexual intercourse (and face the possible consequences), or not.
Afterall, that's what men are told.
it contains a wonderfully logical debate on abortion and debunks every abortion myth there is.I love the "it's my body" argument...
Ehh... not according to a DNA test.
Since they cannot admit that abortion kills a human life during any stage of its' development, they must deny that reality by redescribing life in terms that dehumanize it.
In listening to Court TV's feminist talking heads voicing their outrage towards Scott Peterson, I wondered at their inability to see their own disattachment from reality.
The Third Reich leaders were experts in distortion, and indoctrination techniques. To dehumanize Jews, Nazi leaders had to suppress facts and propagandize with a barrage of lies about the Jewish people. Any sane person reading Nazi Julius Streicher's story, "How To Tell A Jew," in his anti-Semitic children's book "Der Giftpilz," can not possibly believe such filth would receive wide acclaim and acceptance. But it did.
The dehumanization of unborn children did not occur in a vacuum. Following the introduction of birth control pills, feminist organizers became preoccupied with reforming abortion laws as the sexual revolution unfolded during the 1960's. Gradually, through judicial activism, abortion laws were liberalized in a number of states prior to Roe. Feminist literature from that time seems almost quaint, articles longingly spoke of a day when coat hangers would be back in the closets; when back-alleys would be no more sinister than backyards, and the word "quack" would refer to nothing more than the petulant phonations of an aquatic bird.
Mr. & Mrs. Fetus are being rehumanized for those who still have a conscience by the following:
Just imagining the combined screams of those poor murdered children breaks my heart. Abortion is the most evil scheme ever devised by humans, and that is saying a lot.
You are right...Amen.
Thanks for the reading suggestion.
As I feel sure you know, during Socrates time, human life was viewed as something cheap, thus abortion, infanticide, and child abandonment were freely practiced (along with slavery, etc). And because Americans, for the most part, don't know where mankind has been and what he has done (history), they've been fooled into believing that abortion and infanticide (partial birth abortion) are signs of social progress......of 'enlightenment'. They've been duped into opening the door for the return of paganism. As a civilization, we've regressed, not progressed.
People who know the truth but are afraid to say it aloud, will eventually discover to their dismay, that the mad Red Queen has taken control and delared that pink flamingos are croquet mallets.
ping
Can't figure out if you are trying to be a smarty pants, or if you are loony? Which is it?
I honestly believe that God will punish the USA for the crime of abortion.
Smarty pants :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.