Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bjcintennessee; Lancey Howard; MEG33; Prime Choice; Howlin; PhilDragoo; Kitty Mittens; johnb838; ...
The former first lady's negative image is largely driven by the perception that she traded on her husband's marital misconduct to gain power and influence in government.

She not only traded on his deplorable misconduct, she harassed, tormented, and tarred the women who he was fooling with.

She belongs NOWHERE near the presidency, or government in general. And, it would be nice if the WOMEN of America wake up to who this "woman" really is. I'm sure the old media will be helpful in shining light on the real 'Lady in Pink' over the next four years. (sarcasm off)

2 posted on 12/26/2004 2:51:54 AM PST by beyond the sea (A man who says he can see through women is missing a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: beyond the sea

And, it would be nice if the WOMEN of America wake up to who this "woman" really is.

It amazes me how many "woman" like her just becaue of her gender and ignor her shady politics.


11 posted on 12/26/2004 3:14:19 AM PST by garylmoore (God Bless you W, you have prevailed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: beyond the sea
"... She belongs NOWHERE near the presidency, or government in general ... "

This is so true.

Unfortunately Congress is riddled with people that fit the above description. Many are deliberate "enemies" of this country, bent on Her destruction, and many are simply followers that are controlled by "feel good" policies and the overwhelming desire to be in positions of power, getting re-elected, and feeding at the public trough.

This is not simply a problem of our times, it has been going on throughout our history.

Like the Swiftee's and other watchdog groups, the word must be gotten out and restated over and over, until enough of us get the message.

As here, on Free Republic, we will have disagreements, but the fact remains that when all issues are put on the table the one that is paramount is the continuance of the United States as a country of power and influence, for good, throughout the world. All else is secondary.

But alas ... I ramble ;)

37 posted on 12/26/2004 4:24:36 AM PST by G.Mason ("Liberty means responsibility. That’s why most men dread it". — George Bernard Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: beyond the sea
MISSUS CLINTON ENTERS POST-ELECTION MORALITY-PLAY FRAY

POST-ELECTION POSITIONING:THE LEFT CONTINUES TO DEMONSTRATE ITS UNFITNESS IN REAL TIME

HAROLD ICKES: on winning the presidency by terrorizing white women

 
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com

hillarytalks.blogspot.com
virtualhillary.blogspot.com
hillarytalks.us
hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

unfitforcommand.blogspot.com

compleatjohnkerry.blogspot.com


"If you look at white women, and I think that was the key to this election, Kerry won 45% based on the exit polls--but they're generally in agreement--Kerry won 45%, Bush won 55% of white women. By contrast, Bush won only 45% of white women in 2000, so he upped is percentages by 10 points. In 1996, bill clinton won 48% of white women compared to Bob Dole's 43%. That is a huge, huge difference. I don't think you can lay all that at the doorstep of moral values. I think that this president unabashedly and abjectly took the issue of terror and used it to terrorize... white women."

HEAR HAROLD ICKES
Washington Journal
Nov. 8, 2004
C-SPAN



"Crucial to this protective wall was the secret police, a group of private detectives hired to protect hillary and 'Saturday night bill.' Their tactics included digging up dirt on women who might be linked to bill in order to cow them into silence. There is even some evidence of possible physical intimidation."

HEAR DICK MORRIS




 

There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that... [f]urthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

GEORGE WILL
SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL




 

Connecticut Rep. Chris Shays said on a talk radio show Wednesday that, based on secret evidence he reviewed during the impeachment controversy, he believes President Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, not once, but twice.

Talk-show host Tom Scott of Clear Channel Broadcasting, New Haven (WELI 960) asked Shays about the mysterious impeachment "evidence room," prompting the GOP moderate to say that Broaddrick "disclosed that she had been raped, not once, but twice" to Judiciary Committee investigators.

Shays, who is often hailed by the New York Times for his independent judgment and good sense, found the evidence compelling:

"I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

HEAR CHRISTOPHER SHAYS
'Shays Shocker Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice'
National Review Online
By NR staff
8/02/2000





The rape took place while Bill was running for governor. Hillary came bursting into the room to talk to two people, one of whom I personally know.

She said "You won't believe what this [expletive] did now. He tried to rape some b*tch."

It was the job of these two to squelch the story.

doug from upland to Sean Hannity,
WABC, 10/16/00




"It's no longer acceptable to say that the abuse and mistreatment of women is cultural. It should be called what it is: criminal."

Hillary Clinton
addressing the UN, 3.4.99




 

"Who is Juanita Broaddrick? I've never heard of her!" cried Betty Friedan, the founder of modern feminism. Friedan's outburst came at last Friday's conference, entitled "The Legacy and Future of Hillary Rodham Clinton." Held at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. D.C., the event offered a chilling microcosm of an angry, divided America.

For nearly an hour, a five-woman panel had been debating whether Hillary qualified as a "feminist heroine." I thought Broaddrick's claim of having been raped by Hillary's husband had some bearing on this point, so I broached the subject during the question-and-answer period. Friedan's dyspeptic denial followed.

Was Friedan telling the truth? Maybe. And maybe all those millions of Germans who professed ignorance of the death camps were telling the truth too. The problem is, having admitted her ignorance, Friedan showed no interest in exploring the matter further. And that was the problem with the Germans too.

Totalitarian impulses flourished at the conference. Taking a page from Soviet psychiatry, some Clintonites suggested that Hillary hating might be a mental illness.

Richard Poe
The Hillary Conspiracy




[Hillary Clinton] began by insisting that the entire Middle East region work to socially and politically enfranchise women. "Human rights are women's rights," she said.

Though some Middle Eastern nations have taken small steps in the right direction, Clinton said women and girls are consistently marginalized in all aspects of society....

Clinton described herself as "one of the early voices speaking out against the treatment of women by the Taliban in the 1990s...."

Clinton recommends U.S. foreign policy shift
The Tufts Daily
Patrick Gordon
November 11, 2004





"Gay marriage was an overwhelming factor in the defeat of John Kerry... With one decision of one Supreme Court, all of a sudden we have a constitutional amendment designed, I think, to whip people up, to inflame them, make them stop thinking about other issues, [the result of which was] "an astonishing turnout among evangelical Christians who were voting on the basis of moral values.... I do not believe either party has a monopoly on morality or truth."

bill clinton
Hamilton College, Utica, N.Y.
Wednesday, Nov. 10, 2004
NewsMax.com









he post-election pose of Harold Ickes, the clintons, and the entire Left--denying both the reality of the security mom and the utter (and deliberate) failure of the clintons to have stemmed the burgeoning threat of terrorism during the eight years they had the constitutional and moral duty to do so--is almost as amusing as it is telling.

That the Left now regards as its savior these two despicable utter failures, who are, in fact, the proximate cause of their blowout last Tuesday, says everything we need to know about the defunct, defective, decayed political organization that is today's Democrat Party.

Ickes', the clintons', and the entire Left's ludicrous argument--that Bush won reelection by terrorizing white women--turns reality on its head and exposes leftist putrescence with noxious precision.

Their argument is the familiar one, simply an extension of the clintons' legacy of myopia and egoistic expediency. That is, it is an extension of the clintons' failure to comprehend-- or, arguably worse, their refusal to acknowledge--the horrific peril that threatens our very existence.

Never mind the presidency.
These idiots are demonstrating in real time why they must never again occupy any position of power in America.


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004  


59 posted on 12/26/2004 5:21:29 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: beyond the sea
She belongs NOWHERE near the presidency, or government in general.

The MOST under-reported item about Hitlery is this, although us FReepers know it well . . . She decided to run for the Senate from New Yawk rather than from her home state of Arkansas for one reason -- Arkansas is a southern state and by-and-large southern voters place a high priority on morals, values, and other integrity issues and she knew the people who knew her best would toss her aside like the loser she is. Whereas New Yawk's Democratics will elect a Pet Rock if they're somehow famous . . . or infamous in Hitlery's case. New Yawk is the perfect place for her -- she has the chutzpah of a Rock Star and the morals of an alley cat.

But us conservatives will bury her in a National Election. We know how to organize now and eight years of hers and Pee Wee's Co-Presidency fiasco was almost more than we could bear. No way in hell will we allow her to even set foot in the Oval Office again.

89 posted on 12/26/2004 6:32:06 AM PST by geedee (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: beyond the sea
She belongs NOWHERE near the presidency, or government in general. And, it would be nice if the WOMEN of America wake up to who this "woman" really is. I'm sure the old media will be helpful in shining light on the real 'Lady in Pink' over the next four years. (sarcasm off)


Just ask her to release her sealed college dissertation, then the WOMEN would know who she really IS!??!

Like john sKerry's form. 180, it will NEVER happens!!!
97 posted on 12/26/2004 7:28:16 AM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: beyond the sea

She still has 900 illegally gathered FBI files. What will she do with them?


127 posted on 12/27/2004 7:57:44 AM PST by Colonel PK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: beyond the sea
She belongs NOWHERE near the presidency

"My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president"

J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics at Berkeley
veteran of the Clinton administration


129 posted on 12/27/2004 8:05:27 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson